July 2019 - comments-bylaws-amend-iana-naming-function-10jun19@icann.org

[Comments-bylaws-amend-iana-naming-function-10jun19] Ratified: ALAC Statement on Fundamental Bylaws Amendment Proposal – IANA Naming Function Review
by ICANN At-Large Staff July 31, 2019

July 31, 2019

Dear All, Please find attached the ALAC statement regarding Fundamental Bylaws Amendment Proposal – IANA Naming Function Review<https://community.icann.org/x/mpajBg>. Content of the statement remains unchanged. Ratification information is included on the cover page. Kind Regards, ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community Website: atlarge.icann.org<https://atlarge.icann.org/> Facebook: facebook.com/icann<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>atlarge<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>

1 0

[Comments-bylaws-amend-iana-naming-function-10jun19] NCSG Comments
by Rafik Dammak July 28, 2019

July 28, 2019

Hi. please find NCSG Comment attached. Best Regards, Rafik

1 0

[Comments-bylaws-amend-iana-naming-function-10jun19] Pending Ratification: ALAC Statement on Fundamental Bylaws Amendment Proposal – IANA Naming Function Review
by ICANN At-Large Staff July 26, 2019

July 26, 2019

Dear All, Please find attached the ALAC statement regarding Fundamental Bylaws Amendment Proposal – IANA Naming Function Review<https://community.icann.org/x/mpajBg>. In the interest of time, the ALAC Chair requested that the statement be transmitted to the ICANN public comment process with a note that the statement is pending ALAC ratification. Kind Regards, ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community Website: atlarge.icann.org<https://atlarge.icann.org/> Facebook: facebook.com/icann<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>atlarge<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>

1 0

[Comments-bylaws-amend-iana-naming-function-10jun19] RySG Comments on the Fundamental Bylaws Amendment Proposal – IANA Naming Function Review
by Demetriou, Samantha July 26, 2019

July 26, 2019

Hello, On behalf of the gTLD Registries Stakeholder Group (RySG), please find attached our comments on the Fundamental Bylaws Amendment Proposal – IANA Naming Function Review. In the interest of time, we did not conduct a vote on these comments. We did discuss them on our mailing list and during a biweekly conference call, and no member opposed their submission. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns. Best, Samantha Demetriou RySG Vice Chair, Policy

1 0

[Comments-bylaws-amend-iana-naming-function-10jun19] Business Constituency (BC) support for Fundamental Bylaws Amendment – IANA Naming Function Review
by Steve DelBianco July 26, 2019

July 26, 2019

The ICANN Business Constituency (BC) supports the proposed Fundamental Bylaws Amendment – IANA Naming Function Review. This regards the public comment page at https://www.icann.org/public-comments/bylaws-amend-iana-naming-function-201… -- Steve DelBianco Vice Chair for Policy Coordination ICANN Business Constituency (BC)

1 0

[Comments-bylaws-amend-iana-naming-function-10jun19] ccNSO Council Statement: Fundamental Bylaws Amendment Proposal
by Katrina Sataki July 19, 2019

July 19, 2019

ccNSO Council Statement: Fundamental Bylaws Amendment Proposal - IANA Naming Function Review Date: 19 July 2019 The ccNSO Council respectfully urges the amendment of the ICANN Bylaws as proposed. Experience has shown again and again that the pool of experienced and skilled candidates for IANA Naming Function review is very limited. With the declining number of non-ccNSO members and the limited interest of non-ccNSO member ccTLDs in ICANN (related) affairs, it has proved difficult to find a non-ccNSO member representative to the IFR team. Furthermore, when evaluating applications, the ccNSO and ccNSO Council have always strived to select the best professionals regardless of their membership status in the ccNSO. For example, the ccNSO appointed co-chair of the CCWG-Stewardship was a representative of a non-ccNSO member at the time. The ccNSO Council believes that when it comes to appoint candidates to IFR team and/or any other important tasks/committees/working groups, applicants from ccTLDs should be treated equally and be assessed on the basis of their professional qualifications and not of their membership status in the ccNSO. On behalf of the ccNSO Council, Katrina Sataki Chair

1 0