February 2020 - comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Mark John Thorpe l NameSelling.com Feb. 8, 2020

Feb. 8, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Eric Lyons Feb. 8, 2020

Feb. 8, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Ken MacKenzie Feb. 8, 2020

Feb. 8, 2020

I am a domainer (I invest in domain names as a business). I also own .com domains for my business use. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign wants increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Thanks, Kenneth MacKenzie Arlington Sent from Mail for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Brad Shaw Feb. 8, 2020

Feb. 8, 2020

I am a registrant of several .com domain names. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. Verisign should not hold a monopoly on managing .com domain names. In fact, monopolies are illegal most places. Why do you allow them to get away with this? The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. In fact, it should be much cheaper. Verisign should not be making 300% + profits from this monopoly. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Not for the benefit of one company's shareholders. Prices should be lowered, not raised, on .com domains and other TLDs. The prices are already far too high and there's no justification to raise them further. Brad Shaw Costa del Sol, Spain

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Andrew Gruff Feb. 8, 2020

Feb. 8, 2020

I am a domainer (I invest in domain names as a business). I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Andrew G San Diego, California United States Sent from my iPhone

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Anil Kumar Feb. 8, 2020

Feb. 8, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. Anil Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh India

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by John Kiedaisch Feb. 8, 2020

Feb. 8, 2020

If anything, price increases should be limited to no more than 1%-2%. Such an exorbitant increase as proposed would completely destroy my business which is already based on slim margins. I am a domainer (I invest in domain names as a business). I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. John Kiedaisch Simi Valley, California United States

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] About the price increment on .com domains
by Chiu Yau Feb. 8, 2020

Feb. 8, 2020

Dear Sir, or Madam, I am a domain investor and I. T. technician working currently in China. I have lots of experiences on registering and selling .com and other extensions. Nowadays, .com registering fees are quite high to most domainer. But, with the traditional status of .com, it has a high value of a premium name of .com, this is the advantage and why .com could stand the first in all extensions of all these years. I think cheap and meaningful and good-looking new TLD has more attractive than limited and old ( tradition ) .com TLD, as most of the best and good-looking .com has been registered in all these years, which beginner or business could not get the domain name the symbolize themselves, they and I started to use and put attention on new and creative TLD. For some new and creative TLD, it could have up to million of combination of name which are creative, such as who.is, fan.cy and more than those mentioned. The .com status in Domain Market Place has get lower and lower then before due to the rise of new and creative TLD coming up these years. In this case, .com should lower it register price, provides more opportunity for domainer to register .com and make great and excellent deal / trade of the .com, more and more people would try to register more .com to try to make a great deal or for their use, and the renewal fee of .com is also expensive, as I have more than 1000+ .com extension to renew every year. And, In personally, I would try to give up most of the invest on .com but turn to more on new and creative TLD if .com keep on rising its renewal and register price, which most of more domainer friends would do so. In conclusion, I would like to ask ICANN and VeriSign to not to make increment on .com registration. Regards, Chiu Yau YTC NETWORK ( HONG KONG )

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proceso increases for .com domains
by Mike Velez Feb. 8, 2020

Feb. 8, 2020

I hope that this is for .com domains only. My domain is .tv and that type of domain is already expensive. Powered by Cricket Wireless Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains.
by mr.kennyp＠yahoo.com Feb. 8, 2020

Feb. 8, 2020

I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. Verisign is a manager of the .COM Registry that already makes profits at current price levels in excess of the operating needs. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest.

1 0