February 2020 - comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Displeased with this Development
by Enikanoselu Daniels Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Do not increase .com prices
by Ben Heller Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

The internet is a public good and it should be administrated for the sake of public good, not for maximizing profits no matter what. You are abusing the centralized nature of the domain name system for profit at the expense of the internet itself. Don't do it.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] ICANN org secret deals
by Seth Leonard Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

ICANN has been an Internet pillar for decades. In today's political climate, it is sad to see more backroom closed-door deals by big tech. This $20-million deal with no details on how monies will be appropriated by an organization that control over 40% of internet domains...something does not smell right here. This feels like anti-trust/monopoly behavior given the large percentage of the internet affected by this deal.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Mariano Vallés Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

To whom it may concern, I'd like to express my disagreement with the amendments proposed to the .com registry agreement which would raise the current price of .com domains by around 40%. This agreement with Verizon does not represent a route towards an open internet, more accessible and even more when this translates directly to economic discrimination. Best regards, Mariano

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com Fee Increases
by nul boy Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

The fees for .com domains need to stay inline with where they are now so that they are more accessible. increases only drive people away from this domain level.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I don't agree with the increase in .com domain prices!
by Tintin Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello! The price of .COM domain names is already very expensive. If the price rises again, it will be unbearable for ordinary people, which is very detrimental to the development of the Internet in the world! So I strongly protest against the increase in the price of .COM domain names! Best regards, Jian

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Against price up
by Seize Living Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello,My name is Paige Moore and I live in Las Vegas,Nv.I am totally against the desicon that was made on the .com domain prices to be raised.Domain names aren't something that should be compared to taxes going up.I wonder what other secret stuff the two companies involved in this has going on in their business.Im sure this isn't the only secret of messed up stuff they have hidden within

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] About the price increase of .com domain
by Wendell Rios Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hi, As a small business owner in Brazil, I'd like to ask you to not increase the price of .com domains. Despite operating in Brazil we intend to expand our user base globally so the business can live and prosper, but today is very hard to make ends meet. Any increase in costs endanger the operation and the future of our small company. Thank you very much, -- Cordialmente, Wendell Rios wendellrios 11 3522-9450 http://printspy.info [1]PrintSpy Não deixe o desperdício com impressão reduzir seu potencial para crescer. Acompanhe as novidades seguindo no Facebook [2] Links: ------ [1] http://printspy.info [2] https://www.facebook.com/printspy.info

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Recell Dios Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am a domainer (I invest in domain names as a business). I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. Vijai http://www.BuyerStreet.com Dubai, Dubai United Arab Emirates

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] ICANN and Verisign : new proposals
by Alex Goodall Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am *very concerned *about the new proposals concerning the relationship between ICANN and Verisign, announced on 3rd January. Of most concern is the *autocratic approach *being taken. It appears that, once again, *ICANN is ignoring market feedback*, as it in mid-2019. Furthermore, as I understand it, these new changes have been *proposed in secret*, without any consultation with the ICANN community and Internet users. ICANN's mission should be *to best serve the needs of its customers* - and that can only be achieved* via consultations and actions based feedback*. Also, the idea of *Verisign becoming a domain registrar*, either directly or indirectly is *shockingly wrong*. That this concession by ICANN is accompanied by an additional *$20 million funding from Versign* over five years - with no clearly identified purpose for the funds - as far as I am aware - raises all sorts of *nefarious possibilities*. Whatever the reality, at the very least, *the optics look damned awful*. *PLEASE be more open and listen to the ICANN community!* *We have no alternatives*, so it is absolutely essential that you *listen, listen, listen* - and act accordingly. Thanks for your attention. Alex Goodall

1 0