February 2020 - comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Digital Tech Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am a domainer (I invest in domain names as a business). I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Jean Col paris france Provenance : Courrier<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> pour Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Pricing of .com domains
by Richard Toth Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

------------------------------ I am a registrant of several .com domain names. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. An increase in .com prices would detrimentally hurt my business. Richard Toth

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Please do not increase the cost of domain names
by best funny Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Please do not increase the cost of domain names. There is no stopping it once this happens and it will become expensive those those of us who renew multiple domain names per year Provenance : Courrier<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> pour Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Andy Martin Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear Team, As an internet user and .com owner, I am deeply disturbed by this proposal. The fact that ICANN will enter into an arrangement under which, a second party will be given permission to increase prices whenever they want for the .COM domain and ICANN will receive $20m from that party is scandalous and smacks deeply of corporate corruption. The fact that two companies get to decide this outcome is a disgrace. In my opinion, this should be decided by an independent review body with time for public consultation after the review bodies recommendations, through an organisation like Change.org or similar. At least that way, hundreds of millions of internet users both private and business would have some say in the outcome. Non Profit organisations should not be making a profit from public good, this looks deeply unethical from ICANN. From the outset you have argued that DNS is a public service for good. Lastly, why do you need a third party in all of this? Why cannot ICANN receive these payments directly and transparently, if you need to raise funds? This feels a bit like your .COM users are being used as cash cows without any say in the matter, in effect a stealth tax! Perhaps it's time to review how you plan to do this in a more balanced and less dictatorial way. Kind regards Andy Martin

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM Registry Agreement
by trybetech18＠gmail.com Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear ICANN & Verizon, My message will be brief and direct. Net neutrality failed and so will your selfish motives on the subject matter. Perplexed Engineer, Tega Evwerhamre Sent from my iPhone

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by Aaron Gregg Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Owner of several .com domains, and several on other TLDs, used for business, community, and personal purposes. The current rate on .com is already inflated, and would be benefit from competition outside of Verisign. If ICANN allow Verisign to further squeeze their customers who're subject to their monopoly, then they're no longer representative of public interest. Large companies will of course find no issue with the extra expenditure, but the Internet and those who have .com domains is a lot more expansive than those large companies. Aaron Gregg Coleraine, Northern Ireland / Harstad, Norway

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Against the proposal to raise .com prices
by Emanuele Trovato Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I would like to express my opinion against the proposal to raise the price of the .com domains. Kind Regards, [http://services.staging.skyteam.com/images/signature/skyteam.png] Emanuele Trovato Project Manager M +31 6 19304741 emanuele.trovato(a)skyteam.com<mailto:emanuele.trovato@skyteam.com> http://www.skyteam.com<http://www.skyteam.com/> [http://services.staging.skyteam.com/images/signature/facebook.png]<https://www.facebook.com/skyteam> [http://services.staging.skyteam.com/images/signature/twitter.png]<https://twitter.com/skyteam> [http://services.staging.skyteam.com/images/signature/linkedin-sign.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/skyteam> [http://services.staging.skyteam.com/images/signature/Youtube.png]<https://www.youtube.com/user/skyteam> [http://services.staging.skyteam.com/images/signature/wechat.png]<http://www.skyteam.com/en/about/social-media/> This message and its attachments are confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication to others, as any of these actions are strictly prohibited; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.

2 1

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] subida domino .com
by layla Skye Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

No estoy de acuerdo en que subáis los precios de dominio .COM y crecer en más de un 70% por encima de los precios actuales en la próxima década. Por favor replantéenselo. Un saludo Enviado desde Correo<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> para Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] This amendment stifles entrepreneurs
by James Meek Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Against the new law
by Sirius Softwares Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

This is unfair. Please don't let it happen.

1 0