February 2020 - comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Price rise for .com - switch to .net instead
by Alistair Page Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

If the price were to increase then I would simply move all my domains over to the ‘.net’ I have for them instead.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 以诺书ENOCH Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. 沈子淇 Shanghai, Shanghai, China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by David Lin Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. 林大为 Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China | | David Lin | | 邮箱：david060812(a)126.com | 签名由网易邮箱大师定制

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by M.N Wealth Advisory Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Manoj Kumar Sahu Bhubaneswar, Odisha India

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by dyt5AAUI Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I use the Internet but I am not a .com registrant. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Bill Dongyang, Zhejiang, China  

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Benjamin Tay Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Benjamin Singapore, Singapore

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by hello hi Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

Dear sir or madam， I strongly against the proposed price increase to .COM domains.Nobody but Verisign want to increase the price of .COM domains. I believe,the current rate of $7.85 has already far more than justified.We know there are a lot of cheaper domains to be chose,but due to the wide spread influence of .COM domains we have no choice but to pay for the unreasonable price of .COM domains. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest.We believe you can help us to prevent the unreasonable rise of the .COM domains prices. Liu Ruiyang

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] dont
by Prassel Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

you fucking greedy cunts

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by makers2008＠foxmail.com Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. Baolin Guo Beijing, Beijing, China makers2008(a)foxmail.com

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Comment on pricing
by Gunther Stammwitz Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

Please respect the economies of scale effect. Prices must know only one direction: downwards. Regards Gunther

1 0