- comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Kokumi XiaoXi Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Kokumi XiaoXi KARULA AGENCY, Fujian, China 发送自 Windows 10 版邮件<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986>应用

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 1252251361 Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. As an ordinary person, the current price is not acceptable. Although it is the most registered domain name, I really hope that the price will not increase any more Anodelic Aaron Pingxiang, Jiangxi, China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 270022365 Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. windy Yulin, Shaanxi, China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 寒夜方舟 Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name.  I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. changxin xiao Yichang, Hubei China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 2451809588 Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Qingdao, Shandong China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Eduarte Cliff Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Eduarte Singapore, undefined, Singapore

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 空港¹ºº⁵ºº₂₅₈₇ Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. konggang Danyang, Jiangsu, China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Noel Lee Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. Lee Ming Chee Seremban, Negeri Sembilan Malaysia

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 方驰 Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I use the Internet but I am not a .com registrant. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry �C it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Anhui, China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 韩宇凡 Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Alexhan Baoding, Hebei, China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 老王 Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. LAOWANG Chengdu, Sichuan, China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 雨中的何叶 Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Cixin Ye Xiamen, Fujian, China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Cheung Joseph Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry - it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Joseph Cheung Hong Kong

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by sbzhang＠splace.cn Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by bilibili Ar-Sr-Na Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry �C it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. ASNCC Nanning, Guangxi, China �� Windows 10 ��ʼ�<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986>Ӧ��

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Against .com pricing increase
by Subha Chanda Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

The internet should be accessible to everyone and everyone who wants to make their online presence should be able to do it. The increasing rate of domains will create certain problems specially in the third world countries. ICANN should understand such problems.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by mrd Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. deng undefined, Sichuan, China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 王万霖 Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I use the Internet but I am not a .com registrant. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Vincent Wang Beijing Institute of Petrochemical Technology, Beijing, China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I don't think it's a good idea.
by Wason Liu Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

Dear Sir or Madam, I am a webmaster from Chengdu, Sichuan, the P.R.China.I oppose price increases for .COM domains. Everyone wants a lower threshold to build a website online. But Versign, a business company, doesn't think so. Their purpose is to earn money but not to make the Internet better. Versign is just a manager of the .COM registry and they can't determine the price. Nobody wants price increases for .COM domains but Versign. Excuse me for poor English. HC L, Chengdu, Sichuan, the P.R.China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Manoj A | LowBidders.com Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a domainer (I invest in domain names as a business). I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Manoj Bengaluru, Karnataka India

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by zheng Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Thank you! zhengbenyu Yantai, Shandong, China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Jie F Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. elnnyys undefined, undefined, Japan

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Asahi Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. xiaoxu Beijing, Beijing, China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] My thanks to Versign.
by Rui Ni Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

Hello people of ICANN and Versign, I have few .com domains registered to myself. I enjoy and appreciate the effort which Versign and others has made so far to keep the TLD alive for everybody around the globe. I do understand that some people may have different opinion on this, just like they do on many other topics, but maintaining a service costs money, which is a fact that cannot be changed. Versign is a company, they have to make money to stay afloat and more. Everybody knows that. If Versign believes that maintaining .com domain is a burden, maybe it's the time for ICANN and DOC to take the TLD to public or start a foundation for it to allow the public like you and me to offer our help of $3 per domain per year. We can help you, ICANN and Versign. You don't have to fight it alone. Sincerely, Rui

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 李洛安 Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. angus Hsinchu, Taiwan

1 0