- comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Internet .com domain costs
by Darin LaFon Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Domain costs are already too expensive. We are all against any action that would in turn increase the cost of .com urls. Can you please tell me why you are making moves that could effect this cost? Thank you, Darin -- Legal Disclaimer: The information in this communication is confidential and intended only for the exclusive use of the addressee. The copying, distribution, or other use of this communication by the addressee or any other person or entity is prohibited. If you have received this communication by mistake, notify the sender immediately and destroy all forms of this communication (electronic or paper).

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Don't raise price of .com
by Enoch Ko Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Please don't sign the new deal with Verisign and cause price of .com domains to increase. Thanks.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Comments on .com TLD changes
by James D. Fowlie Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am profoundly concerned about the news around contract terms in relation to Verisign's management of the .com TLD. A potentially 70% increase in wholesale costs seems entirely unreasonable, especially once that cost has been adjusted for retail. The lack of transparency surrounding this and other ICANN decisions, make it seem as though the organization is quickly becoming corrupt. Should ICANN wish to make a public argument for why these changes should proceed, then they could begin a grassroots explanatory campaign, and resubmit the request in modified form at a future date. But this looks like an arbitrary cash grab, multiplied by Verisign's financial interests, with no clear plan set out. I strongly protest this contractual rearrangement and encourage ICANN to withdraw these proposed changes. Sincerely, --James Fowlie -- HSJ Lawyers Logo <https://www.hsjlawyers.com/> *James D. Fowlie* Administrator *HSJ Lawyers LLP* 204 – 1302 Seventh Avenue Prince George, BC V2L 3P1 d. 250.565.8028 https://www.hsjlawyers.com <https://www.hsjlawyers.com/>** t. 250.565.8000 f. 250.565.8001 tf. 866.565.8777 DISCLAIMER: You have received this e-mail message from the law firm of HSJ Lawyers LLP. This message is intended only for the use of the individuals or entities to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any other distribution, copying or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by phone or return email, confirming deletion of the original e-mail and any attachments.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Please Keep Prices Same
by Faisal Baig Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Please don’t increase .com prices. Thank you.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Support Small Business, say no to the proposal.
by Wes Edge Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I do not support the change to increase pricing on .com domains. The internet should be available for everyone, not just the wealthy and by making these changes you alienate small business. I say no to the Verisign and ICANN proposal.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] NO FEE HIKES
by David Bend Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Haven’t we had enough dirty politics in America? ICANN, remember who made you what you are today, and don’t stab us in the back!

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Keep freedom afforable
by Leonardo Manuel Merino Cruz Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Please, help us to keep freedom of speech afforable for most of the people. Thanks, Leo.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Reduce .com
by Mohammed Wasayuddin Ahmed Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

This is not good, we need to reduce .COM price instead of increase. Please reduce. Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] About the .com change
by Abdelmoutaleb Ramoul Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I’m against this new deal and the proce increase. Sent from my iPhone

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] No accountability?
by Shaya K. Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Who will be held accountable for all the money you're being given. We don't want increases in .com prices. They're expensive enough as it is. The price should be lowering not raising over time. As technology is cheaper so too, should digital services be, which most are.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Oppose the new rate schedule
by John A. Howell Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I oppose the .COM wholesale domain prices can that are proposed to grow by more than 70% over and above current prices over the next decade. The contract also allows for other price increases, which could drive prices up further, ultimately making .COM domains less accessible and more expensive for everybody. This will negatively affect small businesses. John A. Howell Cell: 713.256.6605 john(a)jahowell.com<mailto:john@jahowell.com>| LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/in/jahowell>

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement - Comment
by Mariah Martin Shein Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

The proposed amendment is an attack on the accessibility of the Internet. I strongly urge the ICANN Board of Directors to reconsider increasing the price of .COM registration.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] domains are expensive as they are now
by Vojkan PETKOVIC Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Dear Sirs, May you please, consider limiting the rise of domain prices in view of the GDP or inflation rates, so the impact of domain registration to the attempt to trade domains is unchanged! Kind Regards, Vojkan

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Tomasz K Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Our Comments on the Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Bjorn Ahlen Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Dear [NOAD: adjective, “expensive”] ICANN, 1. I have been using the Internet for 35 years, and have been registering domains for our own use continuously since the monopoly days of NSI (Network Solutions, Inc.). That monopoly got pulled because of the company’s arrogance towards its customers. When it became possible to switch to other registrars, I attempted to do so exactly per the regulations. This was declined, and nobody I could reach at NSI had the slightest interest in resolving it. Their thinking seemed to be, “We are still a monopoly, and you are our prisoner for life!” I had to write a half page letter on letterhead and fax it to the company in-house legal counsel. In this fax, I outlined the exact steps I would take if they didn’t release our domain registration. Twenty minutes later, NSI’s legal counsel called me personally to apologize and say that the transfer had been handled immediately. I heard that after this, their legal counsel had to read the CEO chapter and verse of the applicable regulations, and that was the end of that. 2. I never thought that I would have to go through this again, but the way ICANN has been acting in secret multiple times recently, I suspect I may have to call in my global connections. You are overplaying your hand, and that never ends well. Monopolies are burned down and replaced with something completely new where the first qualification for hiring is having no connection with the old monopoly. The proposed agreement with Verisign, where they would pay you $20M to spend on anything you feel like without accountability, in return for letting them extract more money from domain registration wholesalers, would generate a lot of energy to replace ICANN with a completely new structure. You have already seen movement on this, but this agreement with unjustified rate changes would really pour gasoline on the fire. If you want ICANN to continue its existence, you need to a) become more open about what you are doing, and b) avoid blatant conflict-of-interest arrangements that would immediately be classified as corruption. Yours sincerely, B.J. Ahlen Business Owner Co-Founder of two public companies 2118 Wilshire Blvd. #987 Santa Monica, CA 90403

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Comments to "Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement"
by Paul Bertain Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

To whom it may concern: I object to the amendment proposed for the .COM Registry agreement with Verisign and as a small business owner, the biggest complaint I have is with the cost increases. The overall financial impact of this amendment is too generous to the businesses and does not accommodate the increasing requirement for businesses to be online; or another way to put it, this is a forced cost increase on an ever-increasingly vital and required business component. They are tantamount to a 131% increase in cost over 6 years. That is a very aggressive estimate of the economic growth for all .COM business owners to meet. While the registration cost is small, the impact is not. If all cost inputs rose by 131%, we would see a much larger impact on the consumer / customer side of things. If Verisign wants to be the steward of the .COM TLD, they need to operate it in the best interests of the Internet community not in the interests of their corporate executives. If they cannot do it, we should find another company who will, and there will be willing participants. One other aspect I am concerned with is the apparent quid-pro-quo (very apropos to current political topics) from the Verisign payment of $20M. I would like to see a better accounting for what is expected to come from that money. I understand the specifics of DNS research cannot be determined 6 years in advance but how much is earmarked for the various security, research and other components listed in the amendment. For $20M, I would expect a better listing than one sentence of vague topics. Lastly, I do not agree that Verisign should be allowed to be both *THE* operator and a registrar, too. This again feels like a hand-out to Verisign, who is not entitled to special treatment despite being *THE* long-time operator of the .COM domain. It is important to maintain a system of checks and balances both as a demonstration of the effectiveness of a distributively managed system that DNS is and to preserve the integrity of it, as well. I urge you to reject this amendment and request a better one that is just for both the .COM consumers (virtually all businesses these days) and providers. If Verisign cannot truly act as the steward of one of the original and probably most important TLD, then they should step aside and they, too, can participate as a registrar and let someone else take up that mantle. Sincerely, Paul Bertain DNS Administrator & Operator and Small Business Owner for 22 years

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Thanks ... You're all set!
by Andy Frisella Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Here's what you can expect, and a couple quick steps for you to take... Disappointing. Y'all need to straight stop— Thanks for signing up! Here's what you can expect ... You'll get a daily email from me, where I give you my uncensored advice on business & life. It will only take up a couple minutes to read every day ... but I promise it will be worth your time! In the meantime, here are your next steps... Step 1: Whitelist my emails Now that I've moved my helpful content off of Instagram ... the only possible thing left between us is your email spam filter. Whitelist My Emails Here <https://andyfrisella.com/pages/whitelist-instructions> Step 2: Subscribe to my new Real AF Podcast Join me and my guests as we discuss, debate, and laugh our way through trending topics and hot-button issues. Subscribe to RealAF <https://link.chtbl.com/raf-main?sid=ag-e> Step 3: Share AndyGram with someone who needs it... <https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=andyfrisella.com/pages/frisell…> <https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=https://andyfrisella.com/pages/frisel…> <http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&url=https://andyfrisella.com…> No longer want to receive these emails? Unsubscribe <https://manage.kmail-lists.com/subscriptions/unsubscribe?a=QBvhy9&c=JYdanU&…> . 44Seven Media 9779 Green Park Industrial Dr Saint Louis, MO 63123

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Alec Blinetsky Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Please reconsider your decision to substantially increase the. com fee. This is the anti-business move! Thanks, Alec.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Carol Barrett Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Please do not do this. It will harm both small business and the economy.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] ICAN FEES .COM
by Itay Grudev Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I strongly object the increase in the fees for the .COM space. We already have enough of this horrible domain monopoly going on. dot COM is one of our base and most popular (and pretty rare nowadays) domain name space. Whatever deal you Verisign is between you and must not impact us. You are a non-profit organization who should figure out how not to hurt the internet community and humanity in general. Instead work on ways to improve it. The increase is not justified in my opinion and I strongly advise you to not increase dot COM fees. -- Kind Regards, Itay Grudev @: itay(a)grudev.com W: https://itay.grudev.com

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] We Object Totally to Cyber Bullying, Authoritarian Style and Monopolistic Approach by Increasing Dot Com Price
by Paul Yeo Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Against .com domain price increases
by Albert Churba Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of .com domain names. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Albert Churba Fort Lauderdale, FL

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Oppose raising domain name fees
by damack Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

What happened to “stewardship and accountability”? Do not raise fees to the detriment of everybody who owns a domain!

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Reject the Proposed Amendment 3
by Coyah Gamble Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Please reject proposed amendment 3 or limit price increases to 1% a year. Verisign is making plenty of money as is and it is a virtual monopoly.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM price increase comments
by Rob Noll Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Good afternoon, After reviewing your proposed price increase as well as your financial data, it is obvious that this is a pure money-grab that will be borne by the end user. Your profits are already rising based on your falling costs. Please reconsider this greedy, unnecessary decision. Keep in mind that although .com is currently the "normal" internet domain suffix, a move like this will certainly cause more people to start using alternate suffixes, causing your profits to fall, and other suffixes to become more normalized. So not only will the end-users lose, you will lose in the end as well. Robert Noll

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com price increases
by Patrick Besong Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

This is going to hurt many small business owners who own multiple domain names. Often we have to register multiple domain names to protect our businesses from misuse of our names and product names. Verisign is the only one who will benefit from this. Best regards, Patrick Besong

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Ill-behaved Monopoly
by John Cardinal Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I protest the secret deal made by ICANN with VERISIGN. Both organizations do very little with regards to registering domain names and yet they want to raise prices. The monopolistic hold over TLDs is the only reason this can happen. One cure for monopolies is government regulation, a necessary evil that may be appropriate in this case. I will puruse that angle if these increases are enacted.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Opposed to removing price caps and allowing unfair competition
by Bruce Wainer Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am opposed to allowing 7% annual price increases on .com registrations. I personally feel an inflation-indexed increase every 5 years is more appropriate. I am also opposed to one company being allowed to operate at multiple levels of the system (TLD operated and registrar) where it applies to the largest and oldest TLDs.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Christopher Kirk-Nielsen Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Hello, I am writing today to voice my strong opposition to Proposed Amendment 3. An incredible amount of websites make use of .com domains, not just commercial sites. Raising prices on such an ubiquitous domain will not hurt large corporations, but individual people. The web is first and foremost a place for people to share. This is what makes the web great. An enthusiastic 12 year-old can have their own domain these days, and share what they love with an accessible domain. Raising prices adds barriers for each and every one of us that would like to share with others on the internet. With an arbitrary price increase, it is not an Internet for the people that I foresee, but for businesses with large amounts of money to spare. That is not right. *Please, do not adopt this proposal.* Best, Christopher Kirk-Nielsen “The original idea of the web was that it should be a collaborative space where you can communicate through *sharing information*.” ― Tim Berners-Lee

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Against .Com fee rise
by Anil Yadav Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Hi, I strongly oppose the move to increase .com domain fee. It is totally unethical and against the customer policy that will adversely affect the small domain holders like me. It is also against the spirit of free and open internet. Hope you will take decision keeping in mind millions of users. Thanks and regards Anil Yadav

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Comment on Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Brandon Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I think before this amendment can be accepted we should get some clarity on how ICANN will spend the money. I think we also need to get some sort of third party or someone to make sure that ICANN spends the funds properly on infrastructure. Some oversight from an independent third party with something that affects so many people I think is very important. I think that ICANN making these changes without consulting or incorporating feedback from the ICANN community or internet users should be reevaluated for future deals that ICANN does. Generally I think that transparency is beneficial for all involved. Thanks.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Amendment 3
by FESTER Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am concerned with the unilateral decision taken by ICANN and Verisign to increase domain prices which, in my opinion, will distort the very nature of the internet by discriminating against the small business owner and user in of powerful corporations. The diversity of the internet is at stake by keeping domains accessible to everyone. Internet is not just about milking as much money as you can but trying to create a universal record of human endeavour with lots of domains not registering any financial gain. ICANN is supposed to look out for the public interest not reach decisions in meetings with lobbies without including other stakeholders.Please do the right thing and keep the internet accessible to everyone for the sake of everyoneMario Borg the Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

1 0

Re: [Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .Com Registration Agreement
by Chikezie Onwumere Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Dear Management, I have gone through the aforementioned subject matter with a painstaking effort. Being a blogger who currently registered with Namecheap, it would be outrageous to impose such 70% benchmark on annual renewal cum registration of blogs. This proposed initiative will two effects: 1) The high rate of registration fee for domain names and the likes would scare prospects away; and 2) There is possibility of most current bloggers developing cold feet in the business and, ultimately, pulling out. I urge you to nip this proposed initiative in the bud. Yours faithfully, Chikezie Onwumere, (Lawyer, artist, writer, blogger)

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Opposition to Proposed amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by John Teague Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I just learned that ICAAN has secretly negotiated with Verisign a deal that would allow them to increase .com registration fees each year for the next right years. This deal would only benefit Verisign and, of course ICAAN to the tune of up to fifteen million dollars. Consumers of .com domains, most of whom are small businesses, including startups and very small operators from overseas, would bear the brunt of this sweetheart deal for you and Verisign. I urge you in the strongest terms possible to reconsider moving forward with this deal, and provide a legitimate chance for a true public discussion before deciding the way, if any, forward. You have an obligation and fiduciary responsibility to hear and consider how these changes will impact all parties involved. Sincerely, John John Teague Founder and CTO GEMServers LLC

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] No! Don't do this!
by Atakan Yılmaz Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I oppose this. Don't.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Comment about price increase.
by Lance Angulo Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Please dont do this. As someone who manages a ton of domains this price increase has huge consequences for me. Thank you. Lance Ravid Angulo. California, United States

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] This amendment is anti-competitive. Do not proceed.
by Tim Hopmann Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Costs go up over time and revenues must rise to cover them or a business will go under. But most businesses have to deal with an open market and make the pricing decisions based on what the market will bear. With this amendment, ICANN effectively wields its monopoly power to demand more money with no opportunity for the market to respond. This is an unfair practice and must be stopped. If ICANN needs to raise revenues, let them deal with their customers in an open an fair fashion rather than simply demanding the price they want.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] No on raising .COM prices
by Philippe T. Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

To Whom It May Concern: Raising the .COM fees with the recent deal with Versign is unethical and per usual promotes the growth of the 1% and the demise of the 99% of us who try to make a living with our small businesses. Not sure if this is falling on blind eyes rather than deaf ears, but I was prompted to make my voice heard. So it is. Thank you kindly, Philippe Til

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Price increases
by Blair White Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I feel that I've been hold hostage in this. Unless I pay higher prices for my domain, I dont have one. I chose name cheap for a reason to get a domain cheap and easy to use. I dont think I should pay a small fortune to have a domain,its just not right. Thank you Blair W

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] mailto:comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org?body=
by Alex H Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

You're trying to dominate the market and possibly be your own domain registrar, leaving you the options to set prices against healthy competition? And you hid the information from the public? How dare you. The larger companies behind preventing this effort are not happy with you, now quit trying to silence us!

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] ICANN Change Comments
by Joel Franks Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Please keep .com domain names affordable. Help keep small business alive! Cheers Joel Franks IT PROFESSIONAL e: joel(a)frankiesit.com.au

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Resent Verisign TLD Contract
by David Crellen Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a very small user of .com domains but require several .com domain names to point to my main website. As, I am sure, many users such as me do not earn a living with our sites, we do require an internet presence. If the cost of a .com domain can not be predicted, and the price continues to increase without restraint, it will put a huge strain on our finances. My belief since the onset of ICANN was that this organization was created to assure a controlled internet connectivity where the interests of ALL involved would be addressed. To protect the interests of the domain name buyers, I feel that the TLD operators should not be allowed to adjust (increase) domain prices without a publicly-fielded justification. Please do not allow Verisign the ability to increase their prices without first presenting this intention for public comment. Thank you, —David Crellen

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Price hike from verisign
by Dionyz Lazar Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I oppose Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement. I believe that allowing wholesale prices for .com domains to rise 72% over 12 years, which is far more than the rate of inflation and also far more than Verisign's underlying costs of maintaining the registry could possibly increase by, will dramatically hurt the internet ecosystem. It will especially hurt small website operators, like myself, and will discourage internet users from creating blogs and personal pages, with the end result of reducing democratization of the internet. Verisign reported a 69.4% operating margin in Q1 2019, so they clearly do not need the extra revenue from this price hike. ICANN has granted a monopoly over .com to Verisign and ICANN has a duty to every internet user on the planet to carefully regulate this monopoly to prevent abuse by Verisign. The only conscionable thing to do right now is to freeze wholesale .com prices and re-evaluate 5-10 years from now. A policy that allows price increases tracking the rate of inflation (but no higher) may make sense in the future, but right now Verisign is already collecting far more from their .com monopoly than any company would be able to in a competitive market [1]. It's simply not right to allow them to raise prices at this time.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Do not let Verisign lobby this through!
by Marc Falk Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a .COM registrant. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign wants to increase the .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. Please, do not let Verisign lobby this through. Marc

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Don't Raise Prices!
by Courtney Harrell Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Stop cutting deals to allow Versign to raises prices. Any price increase more than the rate of inflation isn't reasonable. Sent from my Google Pixel 3 XL

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com domain changes
by Brent Kennedy Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Please limit the increase in fees per year. If a domain is already paid for, fees should be kept as it until renewal. A better explanation of the purpose for the upgraded fees should be posted along with a plan for how they will be used. Expenses go up with time and perhaps its time to increase again, however, the sheer number and increase in said number of registered domains should allow cost growth to be limited in nature. Perhaps heavy fees could be added to the cost of third party domain sales, meaning one company is buying a domain from another company(and/or party), meaning any sales not involving domain registrars like godaddy and namecheap. Lets not force small shops to shoulder the burden of maintaining text files. Brent Kennedy IT Director and Multi-Domain owner.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Chuck Crowdis Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Charles Crowdis SOUTHBURY, CT Sent from Mail for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Chuck Crowdis Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Charles Crowdis SOUTHBURY, CT Sent from Mail for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Form Post from Firefox Beta
by Andy Green Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

utf8=✓ authenticity_token=OcvQiZFuk3lBqpt9mCJ+jUmNQXmG1FG4QRbrFr5L1SY6E6xIt7jb22AHEzp8hwCTj3/LmsC6LSItW4wq5y5VGg== commit=Continue Hi - As the owner of .com and .org domains I'm upset both the recent .org monetization mess is still unresolved and it seems now a watered-down version of that is coming for .com. The marginal cost of these domains is reducing as machines get more powerful and bandwidth more plentiful, there's no basis for continually increasing the cost of an entry in a database. Although it's beneficial there should be a nonzero cost to cover operations, people renting these domains have no choice but to do so or lose their services like email that rely on them, making price increases a ransom without any advantage for the domain renter. Logically, the price should be dropping, not increasing. Instead of this, please consider an open tender for verisgn's role to be chosen on end-user price efficiency. -Andy

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] STOP THE PRICE INCREASE
by Jenny Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

STOP THE PRICE INCREASE!!!!!

1 0