- comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Raising prices is the worst choice, ever.
by Andres Suarez Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Hardware prices go down, data-center prices go down, but someone wants to increase the prices of the .com domains to make a lot of money without working for it, causing a de-facto restriction of access to the network. ICANN should be campaigning for the IPv6 now, instead of maintaining parasites. -- Andres Suarez (need a new name)

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] My Opinion on the Proposed .Com Price Increase
by Graham Jackson Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Do not raise pricing. Rediculous Sent from my iPhone

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] ICANN / Verisign / .COM Changes
by Douglas Cox Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

The currently proposed changes to .COM domains between ICANN and Verisign that will inevitably lead to large price increases in these domains is extremely concerning and considerably unethical. There appears to be *no* description of how any funds from Verisign will be spent or even why this is necessary. We are currently drafting letters to all our congressmen to investigate how changes like this can be made with absolutely no oversight and asking them to investigate who these changes are actually benefiting. -Douglas & Carrie Cox

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Raised .com prices greatly will affect entrepreneurship
by Tom Sigler Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Web based business have always been a cheap way for people to explore new business ideas. By increasing prices, you will stifle innovation and increase the barrier of entry for new entrepreneurs. I am definitely against raising prices for name registration! -Tom Sigler

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Georg Sievert Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices, and ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. I have not received any supporting arguments for a price increase. This proposal conflicts with basic market logic - the price offering domains should approach zero as automation of this service increases. Georg Sievert Marketing Director Stockholm, Sweden Georg Sievert 0733-210110

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Nick Tollefson Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Congrats on getting a huge payoff from private parties, no other reason you would do any of this behind closed doors. Its operantly obvious that this serves no one but our cooperate overlords. Gotta love monopolies and unregulated capitalism ruining the internet. Please listen to the people and not the dollar signs that this is a terrible idea that will hurt the joe blows of the world. Best, Nick Tollefson NEWP IT?

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Regarding Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Adrian Del Grosso Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Hello, As a registrant of multiple .COM domains, and as a consultant who deals with .COM domains regularly, I oppose the changes to the pricing Verisign is allowed to charge as fees for registration of .COM domains. Furthermore, the fact that ICANN and Verisign discussed these changes in secret without public involvement (or even just ICANN community involvement) up to this point is appalling. Indeed for a body whose duty is to the public, it is anathema to me. This amendment doesn't pass even a basic sniff test - insufficient justification for the reasoning behind these fee changes has been provided to the public, .COM registrants, or even just the ICANN community. Please reconsider this amendment, as increasing these registration fees will only harm average Americans like myself, my clients, and will only serve to line the pockets of Verisign. The string of other recent ICANN changes, like with the .org price cap, plus this seem to indicate that ICANN is delinquent in its public duty and responsibility to people like myself. Thanks Adrian Adrian Del Grosso Engineering Omnitech, Inc | www.omnitech-inc.com 5841 South Corporate Place, Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | +1 6053360888 NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment is private and meant for the sole use of the intended recipient. It may contain personally identifiable financial information protected by law. No confidentiality or other legal protection is waived by virtue of this information having been sent by e-mail. Any disclosure, use, dissemination, or copying of the information is strictly prohibited by anyone except the intended recipient or their agent. If you received this e-mail in error please notify us immediately by returning it to the sender, calling +1 6053360888 and immediately deleting this e-mail and any attachments.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Monopolies will be dealt with after the next election
by Jeffrey Silverman Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

If Verisign would like to stick its neck out pre-election when a liberal pro anti-trust candidate will likely be elected, please feel free.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Don't Increase .com Prices
by tolley.gil Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Please, do not allow this new contract to go through. Increasing the prices of .com domains, or any other online "real estate" will have a crippling effect on free speech over the internet. Right now, cheap domain names allow just about anyone to host a website and express their views. Jacking up the prices, which this new contract does for 8 out of the next 10 years, will only serve as a barrier to poorer people who are trying to own and operate a website. Please, just leave it alone. -Gil Tolley

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] The Pice .com domain
by Thi Tinh Nguyen Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Hi ICANN, I am Tinh coming from Vietnam. I am a student, I like to buy the domain .com and the other domain that are cheap. In fact, I am a student so I have not much money. I write you to say that I don't agree with your decision that the price the domain .com will rise. Thanks a lots for listening me. I hope that you maintain the price the domain.com or it is possible, I can buy them cheaper. Thanks a lots for your comprehension and your kindness! Best Regard, Nguyen Thi Tinh -- Que le Seigneur vous bénisse et qu'il vous donne sa joie! Cordialement, NGUYEN Thi Tinh Licence 1 de Théologie Courriel: thi-tinh.nguyen4(a)etu.univ-lorraine.fr Drop here!

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM Price Increases - [I'm opposed, for the record]
by Greg Haygood Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

To Whom It May Concern @ ICANN - I'm opposed to the proposed change to increase prices for .COM domains as well as opposed to giving Verisign even more control over the DNS ecosystem. You're entitled to propose such changes, but since they concern a shared and public utility, such decisions should also be discussed and made with the affected constituents. The least you can do is publicly provide details on how that money will be spent and how Verisign's increased control will be restricted to prevent a monopoly. Sincerely, Greg Haygood Atlanta, GA

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by kane Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I'm a small business owner trying to make a living. I'm opposed to the proposed price increase for Verisign. I believe it's not that they don't make a nice profit, but cooperate officer would like to see a nice increase in there bonus. Corporate greed is the drive behind this... not the best interest of the clients. Kane Monroe

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Againts the decission
by Ahmy Yulrizka Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

As it's already stated in multiple emails for the thread. Verisign has no business of setting up the price. I'm personally against this proposed price. ICAN should act in public interest, not big company. -- Ahmy Yulrizka http://ahmy.yulrizka.com @yulrizka

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Changes to .COM domains
by Max Davies Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Dear Sirs, The announcement that ICANN has agreed new terms behind closed doors with Verisign without the input from registrars and the wider internet community is something of a concern. The agreement announced, amongst other things, also appears to ignore a significant conflict of interest by not denying Verisign, through the possibility of investment through a 2nd company, to act as both gatekeeper for the dotCOM domains and to become a registrar in it's own right. Further, pricing changes allowed in the agreement would permit Verisign to increase wholesale pricing year on year (as well as allowing other price increases) and thus make the domain suffix far less accessible and more expensive for everyone at a time when the technical costs of management are in fact reducing - it could in effect act to enable Verisign as a monopoly for the TLD. This move is ultimately bad for consumers and registrars, though is clearly a windfall for Verisign investors at the expense of everyone else. Additionally, the sum that has been agreed to be paid by Verisign, some $20M also appears to be absent of the proper clarity of investment receipts one might expect of ICANN and there is little if any information on who is to provide the appropriate governance and how this funding will used to benefit domain infrastructure. All in all, this agreement seems to run counter to the transparency and engagement principles upon which ICANN is supposed to be based and as such, it would be improper other than to suggest that ICANN needs to carefully reconsider the amendment, publish what guidance formed part of the discussions with Verisign, and incorporate the views of the wider community and registrars who appear to have been entirely absent from the forum. Yours faithfully, D. Maxwell CTO, Xenon Design Group

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Don’t raise .com prices
by David MJ Schwartz, MSW Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Keep prices low and don’t let Verisign or any company rip off the masses. Thanks! Sincerely, David Mitchell Jacobs Schwartz (314) 363-8087 david(a)dmjs.us LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmjschwartz Professional Site: https://www.dmjs.us

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by frank franklin Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry %2�� it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Frank Delight Lagos Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] 反对涨价！！还想你们降价！！
by 米多金 Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Against this amendment
by nikhil＠chalcal.com Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

To whom it may concern, as a website owner, I believe it is important to provide transparency to the public regarding the proposed price increases for .com domains. They are a public resource and merit broad community input before accepting these changes. Price increases should not be implemented without a clear layout of the proposed allocation of the funds. The proposed changes will price many people out of the market for this series of domains when there should be an effort to be more inclusive of people with limited means. I am against this amendment as it currently stands.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by APP Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I want to voice my opposition to this agreement made in secret between ICANN and Verisign. The whole process should have been open to the public. IMO, this new agreement will have an adverse impact on the Internet and its users. Aside from allowing prices to increase 8 out of the next 10 years, it will make .COM domains less accessible and more expensive for everyone! If this agreement is allowed to go through, it should be classified as a detrimental act committed against the people! To repeat: I'm against this proposed change! Alex Perdian

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Genevieve Chase Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Genevieve Chase Fairfield *genevieve* *“Accept the things to which fate binds you, and love the people with whom fate brings you together, but do so with all your heart.” * *― Marcus Aurelius* *FB/Twitter/IG/LI: @genevievechase*

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Verisign contract
by Sosan Raufie Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Hello, As a small business, it is crucial for our survival to keep as much as our marketing and overhead costs as low as possible to survive. There should be no contract with Verisign in place that would cause an increase in the price structure of how wholesale registries charge companies like namecheap which in the end will cause significant increases in costs for small business like mine. This contract should be reviewed and reassessed to find a better alternative. You can't make any type of changes without advising the public and all domain users of such high level increases. I AM NOT in favour of price increases and MY business suffering from what this contract indicates they plan to do. Thank you Sosan Raufie 6477619919

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Stop this price increase
by Klaus Ondrag Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

To whom it may concern, please stop this obvious money grab. There is zero benefit to regular people. There is no justification for this price increase. Everything is running well. Don't get power or money hungry. Best, Klaus Ondrag

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Sad that those running ICANN are lining their own pockets
by l reese Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Reading up on all of this, and knowing that likely nothing will happen in response to users' outrage, ICANN apparently is raking in extra cash from secret auctions. It's us users who create the wealth of the internet to begin with. Now .com prices will increase and create more hurdles for anyone trying to start a business legitimately. I am deeply disappointed that ICANN choses to be obscure and secretive. Maybe someone in Anonymous will dox you all. Regards, Lynnette Reese Linnet Media, LLC Technical Content lreese(a)linnetmedia.com 512-876-7899 Cell www.linkedin.com/in/lreese<https://www.linkedin.com/in/lreese/> Por<https://www.linkedin.com/in/lreese/>tfolio: http://linnetmedia.com<http://linnetmedia.com/>

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Eric Lowe Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. There is no justification for this proposed price rise and i should not happen Eric Lowe Chelmsford, England, United Kingdom Best Regards Eric Lowe Director ELOWES™ Ltd DuvetMate™ M 07801 946965 E eric(a)elowes.com<mailto:eric@elowes.com> W www.elowes.com<http://www.elowes.com/> (Under construction)

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Damon Theis Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a registrant of multiple .com domain names. This is nothing more than a money grab. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. *Damon Theis* *Systems Manager* *D&L Wood Products* *http://www.dlwoodproductsinc.com* <http://www.dlwoodproductsinc.com/> *617 N. Indiana Ave. * *Crown Point, IN 46307* *Office:** 219-662-9177 ext. 145* *Fax:** 219-662-9572* *mobile**: 219-712-1016* *The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. **If you received this in error, please contact the sender and destroy any copies of this document.*

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Increase fee on .com
by Art Runningbear Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

*www.NativeTruths.com <http://www.nativetruths.com/>* *owning one's truths and coming into one's native self* *HelloAll areas where the Deep State has its fingers in controlling money is now pushing to bring more money in because its loosing money to fight democracy. Thats because Democracy is winning. Do research find out WHO is demanding a raise and WHY. Dig deep and you will see every area that is being controlled is demanding higher prices. Art Runningbear DISCLAIMER:* This email is intended only for the named person or entity to which it is addressed and contains valuable business information that is privileged, confidential and/or otherwise protected from disclosure. Dissemination, distribution or copying of this email or the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient, or an employee, or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, is strictly prohibited. All contents are the copyright property of the sender. If you are not the intended recipient, you are nevertheless bound to respect the sender's worldwide legal rights. We require that unintended recipients delete the email and destroy all electronic copies in their system, retaining no copies in any media.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by interpreter Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a domainer (I invest in domain names as a business). I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. shijunsheng Handan, Hebei China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3
by Maher S. Maher Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Hello, Please do not allow this amendment to pass. Prices for .COMs are high enough, including the harsh margins placed upon them by consumer-end retailers. Thank you.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] DO NOT INCREASE PRICES ON .COM DOMAINS !!!
by D.M. DORCIC Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Please do not increase prices on .com domain names. Show the world some goodness and lower the prices. D.Mike

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Comment on Proposed Amendments 3
by Scott Kravitz Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

As a small business owner with multiple websites, I am extremely concerned about the proposal to allow Verisign to increase domain name prices, as well as the proposal to allow them to become a domain registrar. Neither of these changes would serve the public interest. Verisign will be granted the power to act as a near-monopoly, and everyone else will have to pay for it. Running a business is expensive. I do not have the funds to offer ICANN a $20 Million bribe, as Verisign has done. Please do not allow the Proposed Amendments 3 to go into effect. Sincerely, Scott Kravitz 2065 Oak St. San Francisco, CA 94131

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Harvey Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Please use your power to prevent these unfair and unnecessary increases. Dr. Harvey Jay Scarsdale, New York United States Sent from my iPhone

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Aurélio Costa Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Planned amendment
by Luke Carlson Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am concerned about this new amendment and feel that a decision to move forward without a full discussion and disclosure would be a poor decision. There are more stakeholders involved and they should be given both a voice and answers to their questions before proceeding. Sincerely, Luke Carlson

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by Daniel Swan Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Dear ICANN, I am not in favor of such a ridiculous price increase. Those of us who have made .com websites to (on purpose) make no money but only use them as tools to communicate with the rest of the world will suffer and some will shut down. You allow a monopoly for the only wholesaler of domains for the biggest TLD. You accept that millions of people will be price gouged with no acceptable alternative because no competition is allowed. ICANN has fallen into the same unfortunate attitude as so many other companies of "it's easy to be generous with someone else's money." Will you ignore this feedback like you did with the .org price caps?, Dan Swan

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Price increase
by Valentina Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Hello. I’m writing this email to express my opinion regarding the decision of increasing the price for the .com domains over the next decade. I acknowledge that every company has the right to set its own prices and every company wishes to increase their profits, and that’s totally fine. However, the decision of increasing the price for the .com domains is something that affects countless companies, organizations, and businesses that already exist or that are about to come. So, in this case, it makes sense to listen to what these people have to say before making this change of price. I’m one of the people who administer a .com domain (fantasybooksland.com) so I’d like to point out that, nowadays, companies aren’t concerned only with the profits; they care about their reputation and impact on the world as well, and I believe that you are one of them. Increasing the prices for the .com domains may bring more profits for a while, but there’s no guarantee that it will continue to do so forever. Small business (including me) will definitely move to cheaper domains and that trend will soon catch on until the .com domains will no longer be seen as the best option for a new website, but “the ridiculously expensive” option. Do please think again about your decision to increase the price for the .com domains. In the long run, this change will bring more disadvantages than advantages for both of us, the small businesses, and your company. Thank you for reading my email. Regards, Valentina Zinculescu Contributor to fantasybooksland.com

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] DO NOT RAISE .COM COST!
by samshef＠yahoo.com Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Spend your time and money promoting the égalité of all domain name suffix that are not .COM rising the tide for all boats. www.samsheffler.com <http://www.samsheffler.com> www.sweetemulsion.us <http://www.sweetemulsion.us> www.waterbottleshop.online <http://www.waterbottleshop.online> to name a few -SS -- S. Sheffler Ft. Lauderdale, FL USA <mailto:SSheffler@plungebeachhotel.com> samshef(a)yahoo.com

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Verisign and .com price hikes
by Fraser Doerksen Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Hi there, I am 100% opposed to giving Verisign more control, more power and more money via shady back room deals such as the one that has just happened. Making the internet less accessible by raising more costly barriers to entry in the online market space is a poor plan that only serves the interests of Verisign at the expense of everybody else. Thank you for your consideration.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Comment on Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by NonVidebunt＠verizon.net Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Comment on Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement As a volunteer with several non-profit organizations, I am concerned with the non-competitive nature of domain name registrations. Several of the non-profits I have helped had set up .com domains many years ago and do not have an option of changing their TLD. I would suggest that multiple domain registry services be allowed to compete for sale of domain name registrations across multiple TLDs, including .com. Mark

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by Rob Mahoney Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am strongly against the proposed deal with Verisign. It will inevitably lead to steep increases to the price of .com addresses. This deal does not serve the consumer, but ICANN revenue. Please be more considerate to your stakeholders. Rob Mahoney

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Amendment 3
by Michael Morrow Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Please don't raise dot-com prices. This will have a negative effect on on small business as I have several dot-com's that I currently own. This will hurt small businesses and individuals who are already operating on tight budgets. Thank you.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Alex Hopgood Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a holder of multiple .COM domains. At a time when technology is reducing costs and increasing scalability the proposed increases in registration costs for .COM domains does not make sense, if anything the cost of running the service should be decreasing. The public interest is not being served by ICANN providing a monopoly to Verisign, the fact that there is no competition at this level is tantamount to price fixing. Increasing the costs of .COM domains in the way proposed puts a very real barrier to entry to startups in tech commerce and other fields. One could even argue it is an economic curtail to free speech if you price a domain out of reach then you remove a powerful ability for people to use the web as platform for ideas and views. I sincerely hope you reconsider this move.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Comment regarding ICANN and potential price increases to domains
by David Y. Zhang Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Hi, I would like to leave a comment regarding https://www.icann.org/public-comments/com-amendment-3-2020-01-03-en?utm_sou…. The form did not work for me, so I was told I could email this address. My main concern is that .com domains represent the ability of everyday people to set up a site of their interest and express their voice online. Exorbitant price increases could be damaging to this interest. I remember when I was much younger and setting up a site and contemplating the cost of a domain. The low cost can be a helpful motivator for people interested in expressing themselves, and even be quite the inspiration once they have a site online. All in all, please do not unfairly increase the price of domains. Best, David

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Price Increases
by Regina Winkles Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I want my voice heard- I say a big fat NO to the proposed price increases! Wow, unlimited price increases? Really? We have no idea how you will spend the money? Just another company out to stick it to anyone they can without any regards to whom they hurt. Greed is good I guess. Wish I could get an unlimited wage increase so I can pay for my domains! -- *Regina Winkles*

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Gabrielle Hildebrand Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Hi, I am a registrant of a .com domain name. Please do not raise the price of .com. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. Gabrielle Hildebrand San Bruno California

2 1

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by SEO Surat Training & Education Service. Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. hmaurya Ahmedabad, Gujarat India Sent from Mail for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM disruption
by Syed Umar B Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Please don’t raise the rates. A lot of us are just starting out.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Price increase for .com should only happen after careful analysis of the financial capabilities of users internationally
by Radoslav Stoyanov Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Dear all, In my opinion price increases should not happen without careful analysis of the financial capabilities of the users worldwide. As one of the most popular domains, .com is very attractive and important for various users worldwide and boosts access to information - sometimes important ones. Affordable prices for this domain might be of crucial importance for civil society organizations and individual activists in poor countries suffering grave maltreatment from oppressive regimes. For this reason, I call you to carefully evaluate thepotential effects of raising the price for this domain that is already much more than daily income of people in some countries. Mr. Radoslav Stoyanov Sofia, Bulgaria Facebook: fb.com/radi.stoyanov Instagram: radi_stoyanov_bg <http://instagram.com/radi_stoyanov_bg> Twitter: @radi_stoyanov <https://twitter.com/radi_stoyanov>

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Please keep dot.com affordable!
by Eduardo Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN We strongly disagree with the decision of increasing the dot.com We respectfully ask you to reconsider. Thanks in advance Sincerely, Eduardo v. Teran

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by arthur scheffer Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Enviado do Email<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> para Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Annette Hadley Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Thank you for your consideration. Annette M Hadley Overland Park, Kansas United States

1 1