- comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com
by Smiles Digital Arts Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I as a developer and web designer. However small I contribute to the .com use on the internet, I don't support an increment since developing and web designing is part of my business. To some extent I'll be compromised and kicked out of business due to scarcity and fare Upraisals. I've always been fighting to. Convince my clients that the internet is a safe and trade place to be but how would I be the same person confronting them to pay a new generated sum since I won't have to pay it from my side. Hence to my perspective we are likely to bleach loose ends.. Where we are likely gonna have subscriptions for 1 year and clients abandon renewal due to the Unestimated stop on the infractions.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM Registry Agreement
by wtf＠ingamelobby.com Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

ICANN wtf did us gamers do to you to be screwed like this? The proposed removal of the present price pin on .com domains suck, the bribe paid by Verisign to screw us sucks, and then you want to provide them with additional privileges? Man you suck !! Get it ???

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by raj patil Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hi Guys Please don’t allow Verisign to increase .com domain prices it will have negative impact especially in developing countries where median income is low in dollar terms so it will ultimately cost significantly more to even own a domain for people.Which will have impact on digitalization of economies.So please do consider your step. Thanks Raj Patil Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] This is a clear cut shakedown
by Paul Myburgh Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

The Amendment 35 of "the Cooperative Agreement" was to lay the groundwork. Turning TLD registration into a money-making scheme, especially .COM which has a long history of neutrality online (being one of the earliest and clearly the most recognizable) is extremely anti-consumer. The reasoning given for this change: *"In recognition that ccTLDs, new gTLDs, and the use of social **media have created a more dynamic DNS marketplace"* is plain and simple completely ridiculous and disingenuous. Yes, more people are buying domains these days, which is great because more people are sharing their projects with the world - but to now decide to capitalize on that, being an organisation that is supposed to provide these services with neutrality and transparency - is a dangerous precedent to set. The fact that more domains are being sold should be enough, as I'm sure there is plenty of additional capital being generated from that, far exceeding the server costs required to provide that service. Domain names are already an unfortunate required step for small businesses and individuals to share their projects with the world- it often involves much deliberation and time because of squatters and now an additional risk of extortionate pricing based on literally no value add! The bottom line: You are trying to turn a *vital global service* which should be *neutral, transparent and provided in good-will to the public* into a source of capitalistic greed. Please do not go forward with this amendment. Show us that you are an organisation with integrity and one we can trust to provide us with such a vital public service in a fair and open manner. Sincerely, Paul Myburgh

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Increase for .com fee
by Peter B Rae Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Sir Unless you are able to explain and justify the proposed increase, there is really no justifiable reason to increase prices where growth in volume far outstrips any required infrastructure improvements or management resources. Please justify or re-consider. You have a global community to take care of. Peter Rae e. pbr2035(a)gmail.com

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Against proposed .com price changes
by Thomas Eley Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing to make clear my disappointment with the proposed changes to be made to the cost of purchasing a .com domain name. Domain names are a fundamental right for people to be able to purchase either for personal use or to start a business venture. Increasing prices will have a negative impact on accessibility which in turn will have a negative impact on economic or personal creativity. I would urge ICANN against making changes to the cost of .com domains that could see their price rise by 70% over the next 10 years. Yours Sincerely, Thomas Eley

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Tim Böttger Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear Sir or Madam, I am writing to state my opposition to the proposed amendment 3 and the uncertainty with regard to a potential price increase for .com domain holders. Sincerely, Prof. Dr. Tim M. Boettger

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Against the proposed price increase.
by Hennie Harink Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear Madam, or Sir, I am concerned about this amendment to the Registry Agreement because it will affect me, as a individual who has their own domain name. (allready for over 2 decades ) I am 100% sure that no corporation will object to the 28% cost increase every six years as they earn money off their domain name and paying almost any amount would be acceptible to them. However, there are a great deal of small businesses that would see this as a burden as well as individual users like me that have purchased their own domain name and are using it for personal use, not commercial use. many may have multiple domain names, if for no other reason than to protect their own names from being used to run a website. I personally have 1 that i use for mail purposes and domics at home 20 year Cost analysis: $ 7.85 / year 2018 $10.29 / year 2023 (31% increase over 2018) $13.49 / year 2029 (72% increase over 2018) $17.68 / year 2035 (125% increase over 2018) $23.17 / year 2041 (195% increase over 2018) I am aware that the 7% is a maximum per year for each of the four years and, theoretically, there could be no increase or a sub 7% increase some years, however, I have little faith on this being the norm and, most certainly, CANNOT plan on it being any less than the full 7% in any fiscal plans made. I understand it would be extremely difficult for you to create a regulation that would charge businesses more and individuals less, however, that may be what is required at this time. This would leave a loophole for businesses to have an individual register their domain name, however, no corporation of any size will be willing to leave their domain names in private hands. This would also allow fledgling businesses (aka startups) to keep their costs low at first. Remember, many businesses have been started in individual's garages. You may also assume that all ".com" domain names are used for, or are supposed to be used for commercial purposes, however, this is not the case today. If this had been defined and enforced from the beginning of the internet, this would be a non-issue, however, to start enforcing it today would cause many many individuals to lose their domains. Yes, there are other top level domains they can move to, however, that doesn't alleviate the fact that they would be losing an asset they had invested much time, money, and resources acquiring. Please keep the annual fee very low or consider a more flexible charging system for the .COM top level domain that will keep it accessible to individuals and small businesses. Thank you, Hennie harink

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM price
by Rizvi Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am a little guy. May be my opinion will have no value :( My request is, PLEASE don't increase the price of .COM -- *Thanks!Rizvi* Notice to Recipient: This e-mail is meant only for the intended recipient(s) of the transmission, and contains confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and please delete this e-mail from your system and destroy any copies. Thanks!

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Amendment 3
by Nikolay Nikolaev Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hi, I strongly disagree with the changes in Amendment 3 and please keep the .com price as it is. Regards,Nikolay Nikolaev

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Disapproval
by Timothy Adamson Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Bad, stop it. No.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed amendment to .COM registry agreement3
by 老度 Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I oppose the proposed revision 3 of the .COM registry agreement. The increase in the price of a domain name is too difficult to accept. Besides Verisign, other registrars can also provide cheap services.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .Com domain price increases
by Luke Wieting Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

>From what I understand, the new .com price increase proposal allows tremendous freedom to change the cost of keeping a domain name, without providing details on why the increase is necessary, or how funds from it will be used. Under those conditions, I'm opposed to it by default. Please consider clearly outlining the circumstances for how prices will increase I the future, and providing details on why those increases are necessary. Thanks, Luke Wieting

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Comments on the Amendment n.3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Jean François Queralt Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear all, I speak on a personal capacity when I express that The proposed changes are utter nonsense and will do nothing but damage an already fragile ecosystem of domains. Prices can't just keep going up at rates that are irrational. So much has been spoken of inclusivity at large and the importance of bringing in the "next billion" users and it seems like we'll be receiving them with registration prices that will effectively create a new divide. I oppose completely to the Amendment and would ask for a more transparent, rational management of the domains. Thank you. Jean François Quéralt Email: JFQueralt(a)Gmail.com Tel & Telegram: +60 105 33 56 99 [https://telegram.org/] We´ll start dreading it, we´ll get used to it and when finished we´ll miss it.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Stop Proposed Amendent 3 to the .com rmRegistry Agreement.
by Cyrlene Braithwaite Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

To who is responsible for this We are really disappointed with the steps ICAAN are taking and disregard the voices of the people that are ultimately their customers. I feel it is unfair not to have a price cap i the domains. I pay a fee to you and I have not had any information in regards to your proposed plans. I feel I have been sold out for 20 million dollars!! I'm concerned about the impact this will have on the internet on a whole!! Lets hope some young entrepreneur comes up with something where we can change and have nothing to do with you!! A disgusted customer!!

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Concern to Proposed Amendment 3
by Uros Durdevic Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear Madam, or Sir, As an individual and a startup founder, I am concerned about this amendment to the Registry Agreement, because it will affect, not just me, but any individual who would like their own domain name. I am quite certain that none of the corporations will object to the 28% cost increase every six years as they earn money off their domain name and paying almost any amount would be acceptable to them. However, there is a big amount of small businesses that would see this as a burden as well as individual users that have purchased their own domain name and are using it for personal use, not commercial use. Additionally, as an example, some of us have multiple domain names, for personal, commercial as well as charity. For each additional increase the amount that could go to charity would be cut out just to keep the domain which I don't see very helpful, especially in todays time where we should focus on helping the Planet instead. This is why, in the spirit of entrepreneurship and environment, please You to keep the annual fee very low or consider a more flexible charging system for the .COM top level domain that will keep it accessible to individuals and small businesses. Thank you! Best regards, Uros Durdevic

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] domain price for dot com
by Paulo Santos Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I think is just too much , we should lower the domains and let even the poor have a web site, it is very unfortunate that you thinking of raising it. -- Warm regards, Paul Santos CEO Hosting Marketers <https://hosting-marketers.com/> We Stream. Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/paulo.deA.santos> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/paulo-santos-stream/>

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Absolute GREED
by Samantha Phenix Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I personally own several website, and have businesses with 10+. It sounds like ICANN needs some internal cutbacks and wage decreases, Merging of positions and other ways to cut their own cost.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] New amendment
by Michael Itegboje Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

We are against any increase that is not transparently done. There should be no increase without carrying along the stakeholders

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by shay goldstein Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Monopolization Behind Close Doors. NOT COOL! 😡
by Gian-Luen Tan Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Doing business in an honorable way is the core value of any respected Company. Striking one sided deals like these means you treat your customers like dirt. Not worth your time to build a lasting relationship are you!! This MUST STOP. We have a voice too... Sent fm GL's iP6S+

1 0

Re: [Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Andrew Ward Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hi there, I'm contacting to let you know that myself and our team oppose the new Amendments 3, which would enable price growth to own .com domains by 70% over the decade. We aren't against price increases, especially if those increases are kept in line with inflation, however, I don't feel the current proposals do not achieve the right balance. I also think this sets a dangerous precedent, where domain registrars can follow-suit and massively inflate rates changed with no ability for the consumer to do anything about it. -- Thanks, Andrew Andrew Ward *Managing Director* *Scorchsoft* - Making Complex App Projects Simple p: 0121 724 0447 w: scorchsoft.com w: andrewleeward.com <https://www.andrewleeward.com/> e: andrew(a)scorchsoft.com <https://twitter.com/scorchsoft> <https://linkedin.com/in/andrewleeward> [image: ðŸŽ¤] Listen to Andrew speak on the Modern CTO Podcast > <https://www.scorchsoft.com/blog/modern-cto-andrew-ward/>

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry
by icann＠internetmarketinggalore.com Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

OBJECTIONS It is no joke, but since when did ICANN become an agent for the Zimbabwean or South African governments by trying to force people from their "internet" estate with ever increasing "taxes"? Today Carl Marx is laughing in his grave. The funny part is that ICANN is rather open about the bribe they are receiving to screw us. I object to: 1. Lifting the pinned price for .com registrations. 2. The bribe excepted by ICANN to unfairly provide Verisign with elevated privileges. If Verisign wants to donate, let them, but without any strings attached. 3. The .com TLD must never be controlled by a participating registrar.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Blatant opportunistic price increases
by chris loughlin Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

The possibility of unrestricted price increases on .com domaines has already made me look for alternatives This threat to a business cannot be ignored Regards C Loughlin Sent from my iPhone

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] ICANN .com price increases
by Laurence Summers Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello, I am writing regarding the consultation on the proposed changes to the .com TLD pricing structure. .com is a TLD of particular cultural significance and represents the best value TLD by far. It’s iconic status and reasonable pricing has made it the most popular domain and losing that over needless profiteering seems disappointingly myopic. I therefore urge you to abandon any plans to increase the prices of .com TLDs. Laurence Summers Sent from my iPhone

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Grave Mistake
by Sascha Forster Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I think it would be a grave mistake to let this amendment increase .com domain prices, as low domain prices encourage young businesses to establish their online presence early.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by SaasOpenion.com , Team Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Stop .com price increase.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Saying no to price increases
by Joshua Cornelius Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

There is not much needed to be said. This doesn’t seem like it’s going to be fair. I bet most of us are going to lose our domain names because we might not be able to afford what ever the price increase may be. 70% seems like a lot. Joshua Charlton Cornelius 213.835.8909 Digital Cinematography & Film Production Major Sent from my iPhone 11 Pro

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Please explain how is this price increase justified?
by Top5Hosting Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello, I read the article at namecheap and it says you will be getting additional 20 million a year. How is this price increase justified and what are the money going to be spend on? ICANN is a nonprofit organization and it should have transparency in its policy. Also, in the long run, the price will affect a lot of our small business clients who we help get web hosting and domain information. Please be more transparent in your decisions. Regards, Anton Todorov, Manager Top5hosting - Best web hosting in the UK <https://top5hosting.co.uk>

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Disgusting .COM Registry Agreement
by Sergio Fraile Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Prices should NOT be increased, internet should be for EVERYONE. You, people from ICANN and VeriSign already make enough money.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Domain price increases
by petercharalambos＠btinternet.com Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

My company has been in the online world since 2006 and has bought 100's of domains for ourselves and client since then. As we see it (and it's already happening) more local businesses will avoid having a website and will be happy with Facebook page. We, as an organisation are now buying localised domains and using sub domains to reduce the costs for ourselves and our clients. Peter Charalambos iMarkets-Group.com

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM Price Increases
by contact＠goumito.com contact＠goumito.com Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM domain price rises -too high!
by Martin McNestry Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

The proposed price rises in amendment 3 are way above inflation rates and will adversely affect multiple domain name users like myself. Please reduce the proposed rises to reflect reasonable inflation Levels that the rest of us are subject to in our markets. Regards Martin McNestry Sent from my iPhone

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Grant Millar Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear ICANN, I would like to comment on "Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement”. As a small business owner, I strongly disagree with the proposed amendment, and am quite frankly shocked and disgraced that ICANN’s behaviour over the past few years. It seems that corporate greed has taken hold over what was once a bastion of independent governance. Something so important such as .COM and .ORG should be treated impartially and with the greatest benefit to the public. The proposed amendment is not in the public interest and only benefits Verisign and the corruption which seems to be infesting ICANN currently. I implore you to not go ahead with the amendment and additionally carry our a full investigation into how such an agreement can be taken seriously when it’s definitely not in the public interest. Best regards, Grant Millar CEO, Cylo Ltd www.cylo.io Ph: +44 7540 844 968 Registered at Cardiff, UK company registration number : 07450968. VAT number: GB 131 3717 44. Registered office : 10-12 Mulberry Green, Old Harlow, Essex, UK, CM17 0ET.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by nikoll Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Price Hike for .COM
by Aetherek Aether Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Your decision will impact the entire Internet and I would like to use this opportunity as a complaint against your proposed amendment. Regards, Akash Thapa

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] No .COM price raise!
by Uros Dukanac Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am strongly against price increase of .COM domains, because the current prices are fair enough for all sides. I don't want Verisign to mess around with .COM price increase, for it's just a side-helper organisation and not someone who should define TLD prices. Thank you. -- Uroš Dukanac

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by +12512299100＠tmomail.net Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Leave it the way it is. .com been the back bone of the industry. David Leach

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Mark Monteiro Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello, I am writing to oppose the proposed amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement. The increases in .com registration prices are not justified in this amendment and will only work to stifle innovation. Without any justification to show that infrastructure costs have increased for ICANN, this amendment can be seen as nothing else than a corrupt money grab. Please reverse this decision and return the price caps on .com domains to their original limits. Regards, Mark Monteiro

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM price increasing in the future
by Nikita Kononov Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hi, I saw the recent news regarding ICANN making changes in Verisign contract. *>Verisign will be allowed to increase the wholesale price to registrars for .COM domains every year for 8 out of the next 10 years, and the increases don’t stop there.* Quite shameful that you made such changes in secret and don't announce them. This change is bad for the internet. Please, reconsider your actions. -- *Nikita Kononov* Advisor *+358931546113 | Direct 09-17* +358931546100 | Office 08-18 nikita.kononov(a)telavox.fi Pursimiehenkatu 26-30 B 00150 Helsinki <https://goo.gl/maps/jxMYojQPLS92>

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Reject Verisign Partnership
by Ara Adkins Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

To Whom it May Concern, This amendment is a move that is very hostile to the open and collaborative nature of the internet. I strongly urge you to reconsider the move. Sincerely, _ara

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] disagree
by Yanni Sanmiguel Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello just to informa bout my disagreement with the increment of the prices, this will affect my job and my clients. thanks! -- Yanni Sanmiguel ysanmiguel.com <http://www.ysanmiguel.com>

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Nomadev Technologies Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. Tariq from Morocco

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com domain price
by Rui Antunes Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I strongly disapprove the price increase of .com domains. Thank you, Rui Antunes

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I oppose the amendment
by Jason Leschnik Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I'm opposed to the amendment. Reasons: * Verisign in 2010 has demonstrated that it cannot handle security breaches of scale and covered up wrong doings during that period * Verisign in this agreement comes out extremely well off with possibly $1bn to be made * I cannot see Verisign putting 100% of these $1bn profits into their efforts to improve the system (unless they can explicitly prove with financials they will be doing so) so why should domain owners foot this bill? * If there is a payment from Verisign -> ICANN, I believe companies should have the chance to bid if the contract is open to such changes, hold a proper open RFP * Are there any clauses in this agreement which stipulate non-performance from verisign and what penalties they will face if propose mechanisms are not in place? * If .com continue to rise I'll take my business to one of the other gTLDs This all doesn't sit well with me, to me it sounds like benefit shareholders and members of ICANN over those users of the dot coms. Another example of extraction wealth from users to companies. It all seems a little _under the table_. Regards, Jason.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Increase transparency, listen to the community, don't hand Verisign more power
by Eric Herman Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Verisign already has too much control and influence for a for-profit organization to have in their space. The lack of transparency allows for quite damning statements like this one: https://www.namecheap.com/blog/icann-allows-com-price-increases-gets-more-m… ICANN must increase the transparency of these all of its processes. Please publish recordings or at least minutes of meetings. When major influx of cash is in play, please be very clear about how it might impact the "Operating Plan and Budget and Five-Year Operating Plan". -- Eric Herman - mobile: +31 620719662

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Affect of increase on .com
by Bijay Rai Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am writing this email with a concern in increase in the .com prices. .com are primary domains that are accessed by most of the users; increase in such level domains are going to hamper each and every one of us who are trying to work with it. There are many small companies as well as freelancers, business house who are using it; Please reconsider it and try to keep up with previous price. These things can create a wave around everything over the internet; which will demotivate lots of beginners like us. Thank you. Regards, Bijay Concerned Person

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I disagree with the increase
by P a u l Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear Icann, Please do not increase the fees/price The economy has been a challenge for most of us. Trade war / Wuhan cirus. Please. Just stop the increase. Please. Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by mark＠markbird.co.uk Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear Sirs I would just like to say that these proposed increases represent yet another pressure on all online business, especially the smaller companies as my own. I would ask you to consider us and the effect on the internet as a whole. I would ask that you please re-think this initiative Mark Bird Web Designer

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Protest to the increase of .COM prices
by Angelina Johnson Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

To the officials of Verisign and ICANN: Sent from my iPhone

1 0