- comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Oppose raising the rates for .COM domains
by Bruce Bergman Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Please do not raise the rates for .COM domains. As a small business owner, seeing a significant increase would impact my daily operations and force me to consider continuing to offer multiples domains for my customers. I strongly oppose a raise in rates. Thank you, Bruce Bergman Fat City Software San Diego, CA

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] About the price increasing of dot com domain
by Masum Vai Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hi there, Requesting you not to increase the price, because many of us have many domains for different businesses. Our business cost will be high and for that many of us might leave the business. So, I would like to request you not to increase the price for the betterment of the businesses. Thanks and Regards Mohammad Ashraful Islam.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Price increase for .COM domain
by Sheikh Shourav Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello With regards to recent decision of ICANN price increase of .Com domain , I believe the organization should have consulted with the community. Internet is an open place and organization like ICANN exist because of people’s trust embedded within the organization. An open organization can’t make a close deal with Corporate company for price increase. Corporate greed has no place in an open organization like ICANN. I strongly condemn this and request ICANN to review this decision and have a structured policy on how to instigate changes in future that is beneficial for people and internet overall. Best Regards Sheikh -- Best Regards Sheikh Shourav Founder & CEO Apploye Inc.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed amendment to line our pockets
by Rob Nugen Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Why not be transparent about what you're doing? Stealing money from a public resource only hurts everyone, including yourselves.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by Jude S Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Don't fix what isn't broken

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] No price increase!
by Bharat in Germany! Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I would request you to not to increase your price. A lot of small business owners will be affected by this! -- Greetings from Hamburg! [image: Bharat in Germany!] Bharat Chaudhary Bharat in Germany! w: bharatingermany.com e: bharat(a)bharatingermany.com <https://instagram.com/bharatingermany> <https://facebook.com/groups/bharatingermany> <https://youtube.com/bharatingermany> <https://bharatingermany.com/>

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] rise .com fees
by Vlad Vishnyakov Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I do support, rise the price

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Opposition To .COM Domain Price Increase
by Drew Taylor Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

To Whom It May Concern, I strongly oppose the potential increasing costs to acquire and/or maintain .COM domains. Please prevent this disruption at once! Drew Taylor

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Opposing - Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by boela＠neocre8.co.za Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

To Whom It May Concern I STRONGLY oppose the changes ICANN recently announced, on significant changes to the contract it has with Verisign, Inc. to operate the top-level domain .COM. These changes was without consulting or incorporating feedback from the ICANN community or Internet users. Regards Boela du Plooy 4 The Gallery, 1026 Ripple Turn, Little Falls, Gauteng

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] price increasing
by Mohamed Shorbagi Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Please reconsider prices are already high enough Thanks, Mohamed Shorbagi -- [image: --] Mohamed Shorbagi [image: https://]about.me/shorbagi <https://about.me/shorbagi?promo=email_sig>

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com domains
by Cosmin Cătălin Sanda Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I totally oppose to the raising of .com prices. It makes absolutely no sense. If anything, technology costs are decreasing. ------------------------------------ *Cosmin Catalin SANDA* Data Scientist & Engineer Phone: +45.27.30.60.35 Web: https://cosminsanda.com

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Changes to ICANN and Verisign
by Lars Wettmann | CIRCLE Dance Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear ICANN, I think the internet should be a free and affordable space for everyone - which includes starting business owners and everyone out there who has a big message for the world - but not a big budget. .Com domains are one way to spread your message and deliver much more trust than any other domain. We are aware of your new deals with Verisign and wish you’d keep a) Prices in check - don’t let them allow to raise the prices. This is basically a monopoly and you would allow them to take advantage of it. b) Transparent about how you will use the money from Verisign. c) Verisign from becoming a domain registrar via a daughter company. This just screams that they can take advantage of it and it’s a very bad deal for the whole world. Why would you allow something like that? d) Listening to us! The internet is such an important place and we encourage you to listen to your moral standards and to all the people out there - just like me - who want to change the world for a better place. Don’t obstruct us but support us! You have the means to and a huge responsibility. We thank you for your time and hope that you reconsider your deals with Verisign. Kind Regards, Lars Wettmann Artistic Director CIRCLE Dance t.(085) 8888 330 Website Email Discover our upcoming classes and workshops:CIRCLE Agenda What's CIRCLE Dance? Learn about what we from CIRCLE Dance do to make your life as dance professional a little bit better every day. Visit us at www.circle.dance by CIRCLE Dance | 2014-08-26 | 610

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Peycho Dimitrov Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello ICANN guys. Seriously, I hope there will be an investigation by the U.S. Government into this if it happens and that the douche bags involved end up spending lengthy terms in prison. It all looks to me like some of you are trying to take advantage of a loophole you’ve discovered and try to make as many millions as possible without having to justify how it’s spent so your executives can get even larger bonuses, probably paid out under the table as well. I’d like to know what's the justification for this? What possible reason you have to increase the cost of already pricey domain extensions. Sounds like sheer GREED to me!

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM
by Joshua Perez Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

The internet is a universal community for all. Not one that should be taxed due to a site being .com or not. There is no benefit to the majority of the online community with .com the act of .com being taxed in fact only repercussions. .Com owners will struggle to keep their site alive.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] You are Making internet Unaccessible
by Usman Riaz Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

The recent agreement to increase.com price will make the internet unaccessible for a lot of people. Some amazing small bloggers will be taken away from the internet. And a lot more. Instead of decreasing the price, You are increasing it. It's such a shame.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Adel alTerkait Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am a domainer (I invest in domain names as a business). I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Adel alTerkait Kuwait

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Opposing the cost increase of .com domains
by Félix Cloutier Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I oppose the cost increase of .com domains proposed by Verisign. It is difficult for me to understand what ICANN understands "negotiating in good faith" to be. It seems clear here that ICANN and Verisign stand on the same side, and this makes it hard to treat those communications as negotiations. There is not even an attempt to hide the $20M kickback. The entire proposal reads like a litany of excuses for why increasing the wholesale price of .com domains isn't a big deal, and is very, very short on the real benefits of the deal–aside from a guaranteed 7% year-on-year increase in revenue to Verisign's .com business. ICANN has not explained which projects it believe need 4 million dollars a year in funding, or what it is in position to accomplish aside from creating new rules for gTLDs. This proposal is unacceptable in this form and should be rejected.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] ICANN: Do not allow Verisign to raise .com pricing!
by Uli Schroeder Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

*Hello ICANN,** ** * *We, the millions of .com domain name registrants all over the world, stand to lose the most from a .com price increase, and we DEMAND THAT ICANN REFUSE ANY .COM PRICE INCREASE!** * * * *I'm one of those registrants and your shocking misuse of the trust you've been granted for years is beyond words.* *Regards,* *Uli*

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Please stop the increasing. Com prices
by Ramy Yamany Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear all, I am Ramy Yamany please stop increasing the price of .Com domains so that we can handle it in africa and not to make our work stop

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Comment in re: Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Aaron Severson Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

As a website owner, I regard the proposed Amendment 3 with considerable alarm. There has been an ongoing global movement to make the web less accessible, ranging from attacks on net neutrality and the imposition of onerous regulations. Now, ICANN proposes to exacerbate that problem with a substantial price increase on the most commonly used commercial domain while asserting that this usurious increase is somehow "in the public interest." That assertion runs directly contrary to any common sense; the net effect of the change would be to further squeeze small businesses and small operators, who are already at the greatest risk of loss in the present web climate. I take further issue with the assertion that by structuring the increases to encourage registrants to register or renew for multi-year periods constitutes "registrant protection," given that the entities from which registrants need such protection are the very ones proposing the rate hike. That is a remarkably cynical framing of what mainly seems like an effort to drive an increase in short-term revenues. That may be in ICANN's interest, but it's certainly not in the interests of registrants or the public. Many small operators, including myself, cannot afford to purchase a decade's worth of services in advance to secure some discounted rate; the costs of poverty are a well-known economic reality. It is not that people or businesses of modest interest don't recognize the opportunity for savings, it's that they are simply out of reach. The amendment alludes to ICANN's concerns about security and stability, which are of course worthy goals. If ICANN could demonstrate that certain price increases would be necessary to achieve specific technical or regulatory compliance goals, I and the rest of the online community might regard the proposal with greater sympathy. Instead, the proposed text buries vague promises in noncommittal language: We are told Verisign and ICANN will "work in good faith" and "define . requirements" for potential future improvements. The way this reads to the layman is that the parties are determined to raise rates now and will take their time in coming up with reasons to justify it, with no promises that the substantial increased costs will yield any tangible benefit. Moreover, the emphasis on encouraging registrants to renew for multiple years suggests that we can look forward to future rate hikes, again with only the haziest promise that it will yield any benefits to the security, stability, or integrity of the web. I think it would be appropriate for ICANN to consider carefully its role and responsibility in the modern online world. For example, does ICANN believe it is in the public interest to preserve the accessibility of the web as well as its technical stability? Does ICANN wish to forestall the danger of the Internet being steadily reduced to a handful of channels controlled by a few large corporations, like cable television? If so, you should reconsider this amendment and the proposed rate increases, because they work directly against those ends - and against the public interest. ________________________________________________ This message was sent by or on behalf of Aaron Severson dba Ate Up With Motor ( <https://ateupwithmotor.com/> https://ateupwithmotor.com) 11100 National Bl. #3, Los Angeles, CA 90064. If you do not wish to receive future email messages, please reply with the word "REMOVE" in the subject line or click here: <mailto:admin@ateupwithmotor.com?subject=REMOVE> admin(a)ateupwithmotor.com?subject=REMOVE. To view the Ate Up With Motor Privacy Policy, click here: <https://ateupwithmotor.com/privacy-policy/> https://ateupwithmotor.com/privacy-policy/.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by TY Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. A com domain is widely used for many purposes. For me, I use it as a personal blog. Increasing the price will cause less people build their websites on com domains. Thanks! Tsahao Yu Kowloon City, Kowloon City Hong Kong Tsahao Yu Interaction Designer Mob: +8613246885765 Email: tsahaoyu(a)gmail.com Telegram: t.me/tsahao UX Designer | Apple Supporter | Indie Music Lover | 反类型化 | 音乐杂食者 | 相信电影是笔生意的电影迷

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Görkem Erdoğan Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

In Turkey, we have an exchange rate of 6.00 TL/USD. Even with this prices we are struggling to pay our fees for domains. Please consider other countries and entrepreneurs before doing anything. Thanks, Görkem

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Don't increase .com price
by Khairujjaman Shuvo Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Please don't increase the price.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by Ashwin Ramdas Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Please don't do this and increase the price of domains

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Domain fee increase
by Sam W. Bruton Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hi I have been a registrar of domain for over 10 years and increases fees like this without proper consideration of the implications to those who will be paying for it is mean, cruel and not good business ethics. Where has morality gone when it comes to your business. What are the reasons of the increase in domain fees like this? Thank you

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Strongly oppose
by Tom Tuffin Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I strongly oppose this proposal. There is no clear indication of how ICANN will spend the money given to it by Verisign and no justification on why we will see a possible 60% increase in the price of .com domain names. The internet is a space for everyone, not just those who can afford it. ICANN should not go through with this proposal if it wishes to remain a respected and trusted organisation.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Please leave .com domains accessible
by Ohad B Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I have a small business and .com price changes hurt us.. Best, Ohad

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] No to the price increase
by Walter Proof Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

As an owner of a .com domain, I’m totally opposed to this measure, decided in secret, without consulting or incorporating feedback from the ICANN community or Internet users. Walter Proof

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] NO TO GREED
by Dicky Agustiady Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Basically this proposal isn’t based on economy or merit. it’s just greed. The economic climate isn’t conducive for this kind of move. As a small business owner, please reconsider. Thank you

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com Domain Price Increase
by Adrian Tatum Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

It is my firm belief that unless it can be demonstrated that there is a business imperative within Verisign to increase the cost of any domains beyond the rate of inflation this should be the maximum cap they should be allowed to raise domain prices by in any one year. Regards Adrian Tatum MD Effective Business Growth Ltd Tele 01844 690010 Skype adrian.tatum [cid:image001.jpg@01D5E0AA.1D55EBD0] PS Also check out my Lead Generation book on Amazon. https://www.amazon.co.uk/More-Leads-Guide-Online-Marketing-ebook/dp/B076TFJ… [Get More Leads The Real Guide To Online Marketing : The Real Guide To Online Marketing (2018 Edition) by [Tatum, Adrian]]

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] no for .com price increases
by Sayed Ali Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dears, We are not happy with your decision with Verisign to increase the prices of .com domains, please don't do it. Regards, Sayed Ali Al Moosawi *Leanium Technologies * p: +973 33008785 +973 17006193 a: Office 23, Building 2728, Road 3649, Block 436, Seef District w: w:www.leanium.io e: info(a)leanium.io

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com price increase
by Pierre Sottas Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear ICANN, I am very concerned that ICANN appears to be rubber-stamping a major rise in .com prices. There does not appear to be any justification for raising prices. No economic study has been undertaken by ICANN to demonstrate that Verisign needs any more money or that there is some other public interest in raising prices. The price increase appears to be purely a money-grab by an already handsomely paid company. That means only its shareholders stand to benefit from the increased price, not the public. Moreover, the $20 million that Verisign is paying ICANN in exchange for a price increase worth billions is embarrassing. Not only is it a paltry sum compared to the windfall that ICANN is bestowing upon Verisign, but it appears to be a quid pro quo despite protestations otherwise. Such conduct makes ICANN look very bad and raises serious questions about whether ICANN can be trusted to look after the public interest. Sincerely, -- Pierre Sottas Ch. des Chenevières 18 CH-1071 Chexbres Switzerland pierre.sottas(a)gmail.com +41 76 679 70 35

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I am against the increase of the price for .com domains.
by Marcin Styszewski Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am against the increase of the price for .com domains. I believe that the possibility of sharing thoughts and ideas is far more valuable. As Verisign will be able to increase the price almost on demand it will most like eliminate significant amount of small business/personal websites from the Internet. Such consequences should be unacceptable.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] My thoughts about .com price increase
by Misir Jafarov Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

What the hell are you trying to do?? Why you would wanted to make more money from nothing. If you don't know, i want to let you know that the DNS and web system will be recreated to be fair. Why we should pay money to get 3-4 lines of text added to a file. Ahh you guys never wanted to be useful, instead of earning even more money. Remember Tim Brenner's Lee who invented www made it open to public to let people to develop it. But you guys, only wanted to get more, more and even more money. What you are planning to do in hell with that money?? I don't know why I'm angry but I can not afford to pay $$ each money for just naming my IP address. Thanks I know you will not even read this. -- Misir Jafarov

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] unjustifiable price increase
by Simeon Valentinov Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

As a registrant of a .com domain name for personal use, I am completely against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. This price increase is not tied to inflation and makes the .com domains prices unpredictable (but sure to grow a lot). Also, there is no transparency how the additional money that ICANN will receive from Verisign will be spent. Please help stop these unjustifiable price increases and rethink your strategy to make more money! Simeon Valentinov

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Against the proposed price increase
by Kimberly Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Kimberly Montreal, Canada

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Price increases for .com are
by Yannick Weiler Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

The internet is wonderful tool - in large part due to the fact that it has empowered almost anybody to afford to become a publisher. Domain prices play a vital role in this and .com is still the benchmark of trust in the internet. In my opinion, raising .com prices would further contribute to the gentrification of the internet. Respectfully, Yannick Weiler -- Sent from mobile

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Please stop this fraud relating to domain price increase
by Dennis Rolland Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

We are so disturbed to learn that some corrupt individuals in two comanpinies verisign and ICAAN are trying to increase prices of domains behind the backs of millions of internet users. This needs to stop ✋🏼 Sent from my iPhone

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Stop selling out please
by John Whelchel Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I oppose Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement. I believe that allowing wholesale prices for .com domains to rise 72% over 12 years, which is far more than the rate of inflation and also far more than Verisign's underlying costs of maintaining the registry could possibly increase by, will dramatically hurt the internet ecosystem. It will especially hurt small website operators, like myself, and will discourage internet users from creating blogs and personal pages, with the end result of reducing democratization of the internet. ICANN does not and should not exist to make huge profits. Nor should it be enabling others to extort them either. Domains are digital real estate. Imagine if only one company could sell land in NYC. You’re creating oligopolies and monopolies, discouraging competition, slowing growth, and hurting the internet. First the .org debacle, and now this. Candidly, it's scandalous. Verisign reported a 69.4% operating margin in Q1 2019, so they clearly do not need the extra revenue from this price hike. ICANN has granted a monopoly over .com to Verisign and ICANN has a duty to every internet user on the planet to carefully regulate this monopoly to prevent abuse by Verisign. The only conscionable thing to do right now is to freeze wholesale .com prices and re-evaluate 5-10 years from now. A policy that allows price increases tracking the rate of inflation (but no higher) may make sense in the future, but right now Verisign is already collecting far more from their .com monopoly than any company would be able to in a competitive market. It's simply not right to allow them to raise prices at this time. John

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Comments on proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Kevin Breidenbach Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

To whom it may concern, It has come to my attention that there may be upcoming changes to the agreement between ICANN and Verisign that may result in price increases for .COM domain names. As an operator of a small music-related business which relies on a website using such a domain, I find this troubling. I hope you will reconsider the conditions of this deal in favor of consumers and small businesses, as opposed to the monopolistic entity Verisign, Inc. Thanks, Kevin Breidenbach Colorado, USA

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Unacceptable
by Dan Climasevschi Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello, In my opinion, this proposal is abusive and not justified. Sent from my iPhone

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Please Withdraw Your Current Plan on .Com Domains
by Ebenezer Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Please let the .com status quo be maintained so that the domain will not be taken out of the reach of the common man. The internet if for everyone and .com is the symbol. Please don't touch it. Thank you.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Paul-Antoine Bittner Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am a registrant of several .com domain names for my family’s personal websites. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. I do not believe this is in the public interest. I’m afraid that .COM domains will become too expensive for small website owners. Paul-Antoine Bittner

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] No price hikes please
by Sanad Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Any price increases will adversely affect businesses worldwide. Please continue to align with existing best practices and support the growth of domains.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Domain prices
by Badr FENNANE Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

The prices should not rise for. Com. This has absolutly no meaning. [cid:afdtechetinnovation_1eb9cb27-9914-4baa-94ae-9a9330dc9001.jpg] Badr FENNANE Certified ISO 9001 & ISO 27001 This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the intended recipients. If you are not an intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify bfennane(a)afdtech.com<mailto:bfennane@afdtech.com> immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Badr FENNANE therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] ICANN contract
by David Shapiro Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear Sir, Why bother having contracts ICANN, if you are allowed to keep amending (breaking) them?! I do not agree with this. Regards David Shapiro

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by patricia vickers Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am a very small business that counts every penny right now. Please consider all of us that are living check to check. Don't increase our expense of our domain. Respectfully yours, Patricia Vickers

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com increased price
by moran milshtein Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I want you to know that your decision to increase.com prices is an outrageous and stupid. You damage only yourself doing that by driving away the public to alternative TLDs. You better stop doing that without letting the public know what are you doing. The time of corporates doing what’s on their mind is over! We will fight to get a proper arrangement.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Sebastian Mangels Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Good Morning, :-) we certainly do not agree with a 7 percent annual increase in fees. This is way above inflation and the need for this must be explained in understandable terms. Currently we do not see any improvement for the registrars nor do we see the need for improvement. So as of today we do not see the annual increase of 7% justified. Best, Sebastian Mangels. -- Sebastian Mangels Head of Site Reliability freiheit.com technologies gmbh Budapester Straße 45 20359 Hamburg / Germany fon +49 40 / 890584-296 Hamburg HRB 70814 +++ Hamburg/ Germany + Lisbon/ Portugal +++ https://www.freiheit.com https://www.facebook.com/freiheitcom/ 2006 C219 D9EA 71D4 D863 1F73 757F 8A0F 1C35 8A29 Geschäftsführer: Claudia Dietze, Stefan Richter

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Joe Bloggs Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello, DNS takes hardly any bandwidth / CPU, what's the money going to be spent on? Sorry, I am against this proposal. Regards. Joe

1 0