April 2019 - comments-org-renewal-18mar19@icann.org

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Don't drive small non-profits off the web!
by Patricia Davis April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

As one of the co-founders of a very small non-profit animal rescue organization, I strongly oppose any price increases for .org domain names. We have enough difficultly already meeting the costs of having a presence on the internet. Who will benefit from having more of our money? Certainly not "the public interest". I notice every one of the submitted comments are in OPPOSITION to this move. What does that tell you? NOBODY wants this to happen.

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] .ORG Renewal Agreement
by Michael Stitt April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

Hi, I do not believe Public Interest Registry should have the ability to raise the price of .ORG domains by any amount they choose. I am okay with the current agreement and would like to maintain those principles moving forward. Thank you, Michael Stitt

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Comment on Proposed Renewal of .org Registry Agreement
by loi-yan.eng＠faa.gov April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

I suggested that the proposed renewal of .org registry agreement should identify non-profit or make profit .org. For non-profit .org like church organization, I hope there will be no price increase to church non-profit organization on renewal registry. Loi

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] .org registry
by Jason Wright April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

Do not allow for domains to be set at whatever price they want. Stay with the current 10% increase per year (even that is too high). It is not right that we have to deal with the continued costs due to poorly run systems. [cid:image001.png@01D11F99.C8A92280][cid:image002.png@01D146E5.7E002990] Jason Wright | Owner and CMO 510-910-4359 | Jason(a)MarketingbyData.com<mailto:Jason@MarketingbyData.com> | MarketingbyData.com<http://www.marketingbydata.com/>

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Monopoly Pricing for .org
by Kent Scheidegger April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

ICANN: A monopoly should never, under any circumstances, be allowed to set its own prices. If Public Interest Registry has a monopoly on the .org domains and users cannot get them anywhere else, then there is no market. The market pressures that normally keep prices in line do not exist. In such circumstances, prices should remain capped. Kent Scheidegger Legal Director Criminal Justice Legal Foundation 916-446-0345

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] .org proposal
by John Sedivy April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

I am opposed to the unbounded increase option to the Public Interest Registry for .org domain names. The existing system works well and provides boundaries that are useful in financial planning for registering parties, a point of particular concern to many non-profits that utilize the .org TLD. Thank you for reading.John

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Stop Looking for More Money
by Justin Miller April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

Legacy gTLDs are different from for-profit gTLDs. Price increases should be incremental with 10% being an understandable increase. Our school district is a non-profit organization and is dependent on this gTLD. Moreover, removing the limit entirely makes no sense since there is no competition to issue the domain names. Where does it end? Stop looking for more money. -- Justin B Miller *Computer Graphics Instructor* *Simi Institute for Careers & Education* --

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Comments objecting to the .org renewal
by maria carrero April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

To whom it may concern: I am a .org registrant and a not-for-profit or non-profit organization. ICANN does not seem to recognize the difference between a legacy extension created with the support of the US government, that predates the existence of ICANN and that has millions of existing users and the brand new extensions that started off with a new set of rules, in particular no price controls, and no existing registrants. They have completely different characteristics, history, and ownership structure. It is not acceptable for ICANN to ignore these differences and to propose that they be treated the same. Removing price caps is not fair to .org domain owners. Many of them have websites that they have used for years. If price caps are removed, the cost to renew their domain names may become too expensive, and they could be forced to give up websites that are important to them. The Uniform Rapid Suspension policy is too new and untested to apply on domain names that may be 20 years old or more. With the URS, the domain names could be taken down in a matter of days with little notice. ICANN should be doing more to protect owners of .org domain names. Why is ICANN trying to remove price protections for .org domain owners, so many of which are non-profits, so that they can be overcharged for their domain names? Futurewear.org Shifting the world to a circular economy

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Against removal of price caps
by Okko April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

Dear sir/madam, I would like to express my opinion on removal of price caps on org domain names. I believe this change would lead to uncontrollable increase in the domain prices, which would be devastating to the non profit organizations using this TLD. Best regards, Okko Alitalo

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] The proposed .org agreement is an awful idea
by Pedro Coelho April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

To whom it may concern, Hi, I'm Pedro, and I am a .org registrant. ICANN does not seem to recognize the difference between a legacy extension created with the support of the US government, that predates the existence of ICANN and that has millions of existing users and the brand new extensions that started off with a new set of rules, in particular no price controls, and no existing registrants. They have completely different characteristics, history, and ownership structure. It is not acceptable for ICANN to ignore these differences and to propose that they be treated the same. Removing price caps is not fair to .org domain owners. Many of them have websites that they have used for years. If price caps are removed, the cost to renew their domain names may become too expensive, and they could be forced to give up websites that are important to them. The Uniform Rapid Suspension policy is too new and untested to apply on domain names that may be 20 years old or more. With the URS, the domain names could be taken down in a matter of days with little notice. ICANN should be doing more to protect owners of .org domain names. Why is ICANN trying to remove price protections for .org domain owners, so many of which are non-profits, so that they can be overcharged for their domain names? Is there any motive that justifies this poor poor reasoning? Best regards, Pedro Coelho

1 0