I ask that ICANN reconsider its proposed agreement with PIR to remove the price caps on the .org TLD. No compelling argument is given in the documentation explaining the change as to why removal of the cap is needed. An allowable annual increase of 10% appears to be in the best interest of both the PIR and the end consumer using the .org domains. What costs is PIR incurring that the existing allowable increase isn't acceptable? I wholeheartedly agree with another commenter's statement about the impact this change may have on non-profit organizations. In this case, he speaks to a large organization, but this change would be felt at all levels. "Imagine if RedCross.org did not want to pay the higher renewal costs. PIR (the organization ICANN is considering granting unrestricted pricing ability to) will argue that they can switch their Internet web address to use a different domain extension other than .org. However, this is not realistic or possible. Can you imagine how much time and effort it would take to move away from .org to a new domain name? think about all of the branding and marketing RedCross.org has done over the years. Think about all of the 30,000 employees using a RedCross.org email address. They can not give up or abandon their domain name because of all of that lost email and lost contacts with donors, channel partners, vendors, other organizations, etc." If there are justified increased costs being incurred by PIR, then a proposed increase in the price cap provision is acceptable to maintain a fair agreement between provider and consumer. However, to completely eliminate the price cap provision is entirely one-sided. Kyle Finley concerned consumer