July 2017 - comments-whois-privacy-law-03may17@icann.org

[Comments-whois-privacy-law-03may17] Ratified: ALAC Statement on the Revised ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law: Process and Next Steps
by ICANN At-Large Staff July 13, 2017

July 13, 2017

Dear All, Kindly note that the ALAC has ratified its Statement on the Revised ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law: Process and Next Steps. You may find the ratification information in the staff introduction section. The content of the Statement is unchanged. Best Regards, ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Website: atlarge.icann.org<https://atlarge.icann.org/> Facebook: facebook.com/icann<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>atlarge<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>

1 0

[Comments-whois-privacy-law-03may17] IPC Comments on Revised ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law
by Greg Shatan July 7, 2017

July 7, 2017

The Intellectual Property Constituency of the GNSO appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on the Revised ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law. Respectfully Submitted, Gregory S. Shatan President Intellectual Property Constituency

1 0

[Comments-whois-privacy-law-03may17] GAC Comments on Revised ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law
by Fabien Betremieux July 7, 2017

July 7, 2017

To Whom It May Concern: Please find attached a contribution from the Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) in response to ICANN’s request for comments<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/atallah-to-schneider-1…> on the Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law. Best Regards -- Fabien Betremieux GAC Relations Advisor Policy Development Support | ICANN

1 0

[Comments-whois-privacy-law-03may17] Ratification Pending: ALAC Statement on the Revised ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law: Process and Next Steps
by ICANN At-Large Staff July 7, 2017

July 7, 2017

Dear All, Kindly find attached the ALAC Statement on the Revised ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law: Process and Next Steps. In the interest of time, the ALAC Chair requested that the Statement be transmitted to the ICANN public comment process, copying the ICANN Staff member responsible for this topic, with a note that the Statement is pending ALAC ratification. Once ratified, this Statement will be resubmitted incorporating updated ratification information in the introduction section. ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Website: atlarge.icann.org<https://atlarge.icann.org/> Facebook: facebook.com/icann<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>atlarge<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>

1 0

[Comments-whois-privacy-law-03may17] Perrin comment on Revised ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law: Process and Next Steps
by Stephanie Perrin July 7, 2017

July 7, 2017

Please accept the attached comment on the Revised ICANN procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law: Process and Next Steps. Stephanie Perrin NCUC

1 0

[Comments-whois-privacy-law-03may17] Business Constituency (BC) comment on Revised Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law
by Steve DelBianco July 7, 2017

July 7, 2017

The ICANN Business Constituency (BC) submits the attached comment on Revised Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law: Process and Next Steps. (ICANN comment page at https://www.icann.org/public-comments/whois-privacy-law-2017-05-03-en ) This comment was drafted by Cheryl Miller and Susan Kawaguchi. It was approved in accord with the BC charter. — Steve DelBianco Vice chair for policy coordination ICANN Business Constituency

1 0

[Comments-whois-privacy-law-03may17] Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group (NCSG) Comment on Revised ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law:
by Ayden Férdeline July 7, 2017

July 7, 2017

To Whom It May Concern: On behalf of the Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group (NCSG), I am pleased to submit the attached comment on the Revised ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law. Our comments have been endorsed by the NCSG Policy Committee in line with our bylaws. Thank you for providing us with the opportunity to share our perspective. Sincerely, Ayden Férdeline for the Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group

1 0

[Comments-whois-privacy-law-03may17] AFNIC comment on ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law
by Marianne Georgelin July 7, 2017

July 7, 2017

Afnic is the registry operator for top-level domains corresponding to the national territory of France (.fr, .re, .pm, .yt, .wf, .tf) and the backend registry operator for 14 new generic TLDs. Afnic is a member of CCNSO, Centr, and APTLD. We welcome the opportunity to comment on this procedure. In response to the first question raised in the document, we believe that requesting a data protection agency to provide a written statement indicating that a Whois obligation in an ICANN contract conflicts with national law is unrealistic. In this regard, we agree with the Data Protection Unit of the Council of Europe's general comment on what the "Alternative Trigger" would imply for DPAs i.e. having to "deal with each and every request they might get from contracted parties who feel ICANN contracts are in conflicts with the appicable law". We also believe that a regime based on exception as it is proposed in the revised ICANN procedure shouldn't be recommended as it has already been stated that Whois contractual obligations as defined today are generally not in compliance with privacy legislation in force in many countries including France. That is the reason why we fully support the Council of Europe's proposition in response to question 11: "There should be procedure(s) and triggers put in place for the assessment of the compliance of ICANN contractual obligations with the applicable law raised by a contracted party based on its own assessment (without governmental, DPA's supporting documents.)" Thank you. AFNIC Marianne Georgelin Senior Policy Manager

1 0

[Comments-whois-privacy-law-03may17] @EXT: Europol - EC3 contribution - Position on Procedure for Handling Whois Conflict with Privacy Law
by Mounier, Grégory July 4, 2017

July 4, 2017

Dear colleagues, Please find attached EUROPOL's contribution to the Revised ICANN Procedure for handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law. Kind regards, Gregory Mounier EUROPOL European Cybercrime Centre (EC3) Head of Outreach and Support Gregory.mounier(a)europol.europa.eu<mailto:Gregory.mounier@europol.europa.eu> Mob: +31 6 55 78 27 43 Tel: +31 (0)70 353 1025 ******************* DISCLAIMER : This message is sent in confidence and is only intended for the named recipient. If you receive this message by mistake, you may not use, copy, distribute or forward this message, or any part of its contents or rely upon the information contained in it. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the relevant e-mails from any computer. This message does not constitute a commitment by Europol unless otherwise indicated. *******************

1 0