Hi, I strongly agree with Stéphane and others that a probing discussion of GAC's role under the AoC is needed, maybe a 505/50 time split. Cheers, Bill On Oct 5, 2009, at 1:17 AM, Adrian Kinderis wrote:
I agree with Stéphane's second comment (discussing the Affirmation).
What benefit could we possibly get out of discussing the DAG v3 with them? We will know their opinion as they will make it public. I have not found discussing the new gTLD's any benefit in the past and can't see it changing.
Thanks.
Adrian Kinderis
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner- council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder Sent: Monday, 5 October 2009 2:17 AM To: Avri Doria; Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] Suggested topic for GAC-GNSO meeting
Thanks Avri.
The DAGv3 is obviously a topic of major interest. We may also wish to ask the GAC to tell us how they see their larger role within ICANN as a result of the Affirmation...
Stéphane
Le 04/10/09 13:34, « Avri Doria » <avri@acm.org> a écrit :
Hi,
Thsi topic suggested by the chair of GAC is:
* Meeting with GNSO Council · New gTLD policy implementation (DAG v3)
He is open to other topics if we would like to suggest one.
Is the council ok with it, or would we prefer some other topic?
thanks a.
*********************************************************** William J. Drake Senior Associate Centre for International Governance Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies Geneva, Switzerland william.drake@graduateinstitute.ch www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html ***********************************************************