I am happy to second the motion! Thomas ============= thomas-rickert.tel +49.228.74.898.0 Am 03.04.2013 um 13:27 schrieb "Jonathan Robinson" <jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com>:
Thanks Wendy,
Technically, this just missed the deadline but personally I have no objections on this basis. Providing no objections are received, I suggest we proceed as though it did not miss the deadline.
Do we have a second for this motion?
Jonathan
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Wendy Seltzer Sent: 03 April 2013 01:28 To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] Proposed Motion on RAA
I'd like to propose the following motion for the Beijing meeting (resending from the correct address):
Whereas the most recently posted draft Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA) has raised serious concerns of policy among most of the stakeholder groups in the GNSO [see Minutes of March call];
Whereas ICANN negotiators have held it out as a blocker to the implementation of the New gTLD Program;
Resolved, Council recommends that ICANN permit Registrars to extend the rights and obligations in the current RAA and its renewals to new gTLDs until such time as the GNSO adopts a consensus supporting the policy changes in any proposed new RAA.
Thanks, --Wendy
-- Wendy Seltzer -- wendy@seltzer.org +1 617.863.0613 Policy Counsel, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University Visiting Fellow, Yale Law School Information Society Project http://wendy.seltzer.org/ https://www.chillingeffects.org/ https://www.torproject.org/ http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/