I want to compliment Ross and the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy planning group for fulfilling the prioritization task and would like to put forward some ideas for next steps. It seems unlikely that a PDP covering all 19 items would be practical or wise and Ross indicated as much when I questioned him in our last meeting. It also seems impractical to initate 19 separate PDPs whether that happened sequentially or simultaneously. Therefore, I suggest that we consider the following follow-up actions: 1. Ask the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy planning group if they would be willing to do a little more work in support of this area. 2. If they are willing, task them with developing and recommending a plan to the Council for proceeding with several PDPs to deal with the 19 items. Such a plan could involve any of the following tasks but would not need to be limited to: organizing the 19 items into groups of issues that could possibly be considered together in the same PDP; prioritizing groups; identifying any items that may not have sufficient value to warrant PDP consideration. 3. If they are not willing, form a new group to accomplish the tasks in 2. Clearly, the ideal solution would seem to me to be to enlist the support of the existing group because they are well versed on the issues. Chuck -----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 2:16 PM To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] Fwd: Final Report Hi, Here is the report Ross spoke of in yesterday's meting. I have put a first discussion of this on the agenda for 17 January as requested in yesterday's meeting. Thanks to Ross and the other members of the Inter-registrar Transfers Prioritization WG for their efforts. a. Begin forwarded message: