Thanks Keith, A complex topic from a procedural point of view, while I partially agree with the position ICANN Org has taken here I’m concerned about the precedent in which it sets in certain ways. A topic for the community to discuss going forward, but thankfully no immediate need for Council to take any actions here that I see. I understand that at the SPS the topic of EC actions and the processes was discussed as a future action item for Council, having been around and involved during the drafting of the CCWG would be happy to work with Council leadership on this topic as I think as we see below that navigating these powers and our role as a Decisional Participant in the EC is something that I think we need to be more aware of and have a better grasp of the scope and requirements that it places on Council going forward. --- James Gannon From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of "Drazek, Keith via council" <council@gnso.icann.org> Reply to: "Drazek, Keith" <kdrazek@verisign.com> Date: Wednesday, 5 February 2020 at 18:25 To: "council@gnso.icann.org" <council@gnso.icann.org> Cc: "gnso-secs@icann.org" <gnso-secs@icann.org> Subject: [council] Fwd: [ECAdmin] Correspondence Hi all, FYI, a response from ICANN to the ASO concerning their Empowered Community Decisional Participant inspection request. Copied to the EC Admin email list. Keith Begin forwarded message: From: Peg Rettino <peg.rettino@icann.org> Date: February 5, 2020 at 1:05:52 PM EST To: "ecadmin@icann.org" <ecadmin@icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [ECAdmin] Correspondence Greetings, The attached is sent on behalf of John Jeffrey. Best, Peg -- Peg Rettino Project Specialist & Executive Assistant to John Jeffrey General Counsel and Secretary ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094 peg.rettino@icann.org<mailto:peg.rettino@icann.org> Slack: peg.rettino Direct: 310-301-3868