Perhaps not a formal vote, but an informal straw poll, if necessary? Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal Virtualaw LLC 1155 F Street, NW Suite 1050 Washington, DC 20004 202-559-8597/Direct 202-559-8750/Fax 202-255-6172/cell Twitter: @VlawDC "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey -----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Paul McGrady (Policy) Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 1:47 PM To: 'Johan Helsingius'; 'WUKnoben'; council@gnso.icann.org Cc: egmorris1@toast.net Subject: RE: [council] Proposed Edit to Council Letter to CCWG-ACCT I do not support any rushed votes on today's call, with no notice to my C that such a vote would be happening and no ability to get instructions, if that is what is being proposed. -----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Johan Helsingius Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 12:08 PM To: WUKnoben; council@gnso.icann.org Cc: egmorris1@toast.net Subject: Re: [council] Proposed Edit to Council Letter to CCWG-ACCT Wolf-Ulrich,
you're right, there is not overall support; but the reverse that the GNSO overall doesn't support rec 11 is also not correct.
I agree - or, rather, to be really precise, we don't actually know how strong or weak the support is. We know not everybody supports it, and we know not everybody is against it. Therefore I support the suggestion Ed proposed to have a vote to find out the exact degree of support. Julf ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2016.0.7227 / Virus Database: 4489/11316 - Release Date: 01/03/16 Internal Virus Database is out of date.