Alan, The motion is not intended to exclude individual noncommercial users who are involved in the NCUC but is worded to include any users who are not part of the NCUC. One source of the latter might be the GNSO GA list. I believe that we already have a couple people in that category on the Council: Avri and Olga. Chuck ________________________________ From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2009 1:43 PM To: GNSO Council Subject: Re: [council] [Motion on users and GNSO] I have a question. Assuming the answer regarding the clause below is yes, where/how do you envisage quickly finding these user representatives. Since their task will be to work with ALAC and At-Large to develop a recommendation to be "forwarded to the NCUC for their consideration", the implication is that they themselves are not from NCUC. Alan At 22/01/2009 08:23 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote: My apologies for being several hours late, but I would like to make the motion that is attached and copied below for consideration at our 29 Jan meeting. A second is welcome as are friendly amendments. ..... * Determine whether the ALAC and At-Large community would like the GNSO to identify some noncommercial user representatives, especially individual users, who would be willing to work with the ALAC and At-Large community to develop a recommendation regarding the Board's request that could be forwarded to the NCUC for their consideration in developing a stakeholder group charter and to the Board for action on GNSO improvement recommendations. ......