It is the same for the RC. Best, tom Am 16.04.2007 schrieb Gomes, Chuck:
I can only speak for the RyC. Our reps vote the wishes of the constituency. It is possible for a split vote if for example the interests of the sTLDs were different than the uTLDs, but I do not think that has ever happened.
Chuck Gomes
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify sender immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 2:18 PM To: Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] Term of the next GNSO Council chair
On 16 apr 2007, at 14.10, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
Assuming that Council reps, with the exception of the NomComm appointees, would be voting the wishes of their constituencies,
a question on this:
On votes like this, do constituencies always mandate the voting of the representatives, or do they ever leave it open for the representative to voter her or his preference, e.g. was the vote for seat 13, by constituency or by council member? Are there occasions where a constituency is split on candidates? what happens in those cases - due they do a mandated split of the vote, i.e. reps a, b vote for x and repc vote for y?
a.
Gruss, tom (__) (OO)_____ (oo) /|\ A cow is not entirely full of | |--/ | * milk some of it is hamburger! w w w w