Thanks Bruce. What are the criteria by which portions of these materials are redacted, and who makes the decision whether to redact, and how can it be appealed? I was appalled to see the 'risk analysis' stricken from the VI discussion, since obviously that is the most important information/opinion provided to the Board on that topic (all else was provided by the VI-WG), and is most deserving of community transparency. Best, Mike Mike Rodenbaugh RODENBAUGH LAW tel/fax: +1 (415) 738-8087 http://rodenbaugh.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Tonkin Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 8:19 PM To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] ICANN Board briefing materials for the Trondheim meeting - 24/25 September 2010 Hello All, The ICANN staff have published some of the briefing materials provided to the Board for the Trondheim meeting on 24-25 September 2010. See: http://www.icann.org/en/minutes Regards, Bruce Tonkin