Yup, I saw that. Thanks to Avri for her research work, and for you for pointing out that critical line in the RySG charter that I missed. Alan At 11/11/2010 09:09 AM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
As Avri pointed out to Rosemary, this is not in the Bylaws but in the GNSO Improvement recommendations approved by the Board and currently being implemented in SG and Constituency charters.
Chuck
From: alan.greenberg@sympatico.ca [mailto:alan.greenberg@sympatico.ca] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 10:15 PM To: Adrian Kinderis; Gomes, Chuck; Council GNSO Subject: RE: [council] ICANN Board Votes to Enhance New gTLDs Competition
Can you point to where the Bylaws (or anything else) say that? Alan
At 10/11/2010 08:53 PM, Adrian Kinderis wrote:
Right.
So you can be a member of each. Just not a voting member.
Adrian Kinderis
From: Gomes, Chuck [ mailto:cgomes@verisign.com] Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 8:47 AM To: Alan Greenberg; Adrian Kinderis; Council GNSO Subject: RE: (SCL > 6): [council] ICANN Board Votes to Enhance New gTLDs Competition
I believe the revised Bylaws GNSO provisions require that someone may not vote in more than one SG or Constituency.
Chuck
From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [ mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 12:42 PM To: Adrian Kinderis; Council GNSO Subject: Re: (SCL > 6): [council] ICANN Board Votes to Enhance New gTLDs Competition
The old Bylaws said that an organization could be a member of more than one Constituency. I would have sworn that the new Bylaws explicitly said that you could not participate in multiple SG and had to choose, but I cannot find that clause there. Is there a rule in either SG charter about multiple memberships??
Alan
At 10/11/2010 02:18 AM, Adrian Kinderis wrote: Wow!
So what happens to the Contracted Party house? Did they think of that? ;)
Adrian Kinderis