Hi Donna, You wrote that these are "not" submitted for Council’s consideration. Apologies to focus on semantics but did you mean they are "now" submitted for Council’s consideration? Thank you for clarifying. Kind regards, Ayden Férdeline Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 22:36, Austin, Donna via council <council@gnso.icann.org> wrote:
All
Please find attached draft GNSO Council comments on Operating Standards for Specific Reviews. These comments have been drafted by Susan Kawaguchi, Darcy Southwell and myself and are not submitted to Council for consideration.
I think the comments are in really good shape with one exception: 3.15 that addresses removal of review team members. So it would be appreciated if folks could pay particular attention to that section.
The aim is to have the comments approved during our Council meeting on 30 January, in order to submit the comments by the deadline of 2 February.
https://www.icann.org/public-comments/reviews-standards-2017-10-17-en
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/draft-operating-standards-specif...
Look forward to your input.
Thanks
Donna
Donna Austin Neustar, Inc./Senior Policy Manager, Registry SolutionsMobile:+1 310 890 9655donna.austin@team.neustar / Website:[home.neustar](http://www.home.neustar/)
Follow Neustar: [LinkedIn](http://www.linkedin.com/company/5349) / [Twitter](http://www.twitter.com/neustar) Reduce your environmental footprint. Print only if necessary.
---------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this email message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this email message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.