The change seems fine go me as well. Chuck -----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Edmon Chung Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 10:12 PM To: 'Council GNSO' Subject: RE: [council] Response to ccNSO/GAC Issues report Agreed. Edmon
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Kinderis Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 10:11 AM To: Avri Doria; Council GNSO Subject: RE: [council] Response to ccNSO/GAC Issues report
The same issue was raised at our table Avri.
I believe your suggested change would be appropriate.
Regards,
Adrian Kinderis Managing Director AusRegistry Group Pty Ltd Level 8, 10 Queens Road Melbourne. Victoria Australia. 3004 Ph: +61 3 9866 3710 Fax: +61 3 9866 1970 Email: adrian@ausregistry.com Web: www.ausregistrygroup.com
The information contained in this communication is intended for the named recipients only. It is subject to copyright and may contain legally privileged and confidential information and if you are not an intended recipient you must not use, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this communication in error, please delete all copies from your system and notify us immediately.
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Monday, 11 February 2008 12:59 PM To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] Response to ccNSO/GAC Issues report
Hi,
At my table this evening, we had a conversation about Executive summary point #5 - specifically the last phrase "... without GNSO's concurrence"
While explaning it this, I explained that it really refered to the need to have have resolved the issue as explained in #2 and the ICANn community had achieved a common agreement of an interim procedure.
I am wondering whether we might be to change it to say: " without prior community concurrence"
thanks
a.