Thanks Rafik. Councilors: It seems to me that this was a simple error that would not have impacted approval of the charter. If anyone, disagrees, please say so. Otherwise, I suggest that we approve the corrected charter and make the correction. If anyone objects to this, please speak up before our meeting on Wednesday or in that meeting. Glen – Please add this as item 9.2 with applicable links and the added item 5 (i.e., Rafik’s message): Charter Correction for JAS WG (SO/AC gTLD Applicant Support) . Chuck From: Rafik Dammak [mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, September 06, 2010 10:44 AM To: Gomes, Chuck; Council GNSO Subject: charter for JAS WG Hello Chuck, I am sending this email acting as GNSO liaison for JAS WG (SO/AC New gTLD Applicant Support ) and requesting to fix an issue with the WG charter. It seems that the GNSO council voted for the motion "20100520-3" which includes links redirected to version of WG charter containing only 4 objectives (in GNSO page http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-jas-wg-charter-12may10-en.htm) when the correct version of the charter contains 5 objectives (here in the WG wiki https://st.icann.org/so-ac-new-gtld-wg/index.cgi?so_ac_new_gtld_applicant_su...) The missing objective is the number 5 which you can find in the wiki page: "To identify conditions and mechanisms required to minimize the risk of inappropriate access to support" Best Regards Rafik