Bill, Your suggestions fit nicely into the topic that has already been selected by all three groups (GNSO, GAC & ccNSO) based on the paper that Liz produced regarding what needs to be done in the future regarding community WGs. It seems natural to me to talk about successes and failures of the Rec6 CWG and the JAS WG as we explore how we facilitate CWGs going forward. Chuck
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner- council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of William Drake Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 7:37 AM To: GNSO Council List Subject: [council] GNSO-GAC meeting in Cartagena
Hi
On tomorrow's call we are to discuss "6.2 Topic(s) for Joint meetings with the GAC & ccNSO"
We've just had two intensive and successful group collaborations on questions of particular interest to the GAC, namely Rec. 6/former MAPO and JAS/applicant support. Wouldn't it be helpful to hear GAC perspectives and engage in some dialogue with them on a) the outputs of these groups, and how well they speak to concerns GAC has raised in the past, and b) how those outputs should be dealt with going forward? Given all the efforts expended and the pressing need to settle this stuff to the community's satisfaction, one would think this is the best way we could use the time. Unless of course we'd prefer to talk about categories :-)
Thoughts?
Best,
Bill
*********************************************************** William J. Drake Senior Associate Centre for International Governance Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies Geneva, Switzerland william.drake@graduateinstitute.ch www.williamdrake.org ***********************************************************