Hi, Keith. I definitely appreciate the time made available to coordinate a successor structure before GNSO withdrawal. I think it’s critical that any attempts to create a new structure come with a deadline to do so. Do you think the 3+ months between now and Abu Dhabi are sufficient to accomplish this? I’m wondering if setting an ICANN61 deadline would be more appropriate. This would allow the Council to meet with the CCWG-IG and any other interested parties in Abu Dhabi to craft the successor framework. Thanks, Darcy From: <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@icann.org> Date: Monday, July 3, 2017 at 12:41 PM To: "Drazek, Keith" <kdrazek@verisign.com>, "council@gnso.icann.org" <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: Re: [council] Fwd: Draft motion CCWG-IG Dear Keith, The clean version of the motion has been posted on the corresponding page for the GNSO Council meeting on the 13th July 2017: https://community.icann.org/x/DWfwAw Kind regards Nathalie From: <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of "council@gnso.icann.org" <council@gnso.icann.org> Reply-To: "kdrazek@verisign.com" <kdrazek@verisign.com> Date: Monday, July 3, 2017 at 5:13 PM To: "council@gnso.icann.org" <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: [council] Fwd: Draft motion CCWG-IG Hi all, As discussed in Johannesburg, attached is a draft motion on the CCWG-IG. As you'll see, it enables the group to coordinate with the other chartering organizations on a successor structure between now and Abu Dhabi while ensuring there is no gap in coverage. Happy to discuss further. Regards, Keith <Motion CCWG IG - 30 June 2017 .docx> _______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council