i prefer the second approach. Ken Stubbs Marilyn Cade wrote:
Obviously, the Council should file short comments in full support. :-) Should we do this as a voted item? Or, having previously expressed our unanimous support, can we use that as the basis and just make a short, supporting comment?
Marilyn
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of GNSO.SECRETARIAT@GNSO.ICANN.ORG Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2005 4:53 PM To: council@gnso.icann.org Subject: [council] Public Comment period on Proposed Change to ICANN Bylaws Regarding the Number of GNSO Council Representatives.
[To: ga[at]gnso.icann.org; announce[at]gnso.icann.org] [To: liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org; council[at]gnso.icann.org]
http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-18mar05.htm
The public Comment period has commenced on the Proposed Change to ICANN Bylaws Regarding the Number of GNSO Council Representatives.
Proposed change to the ICANN Bylaws:
Section 3. GNSO COUNCIL Subject to the provisions of the Transition Article of these Bylaws, the GNSO Council shall consist of three representatives selected by each of the Constituencies described in Section 5 of this Article, and three persons selected by the ICANN Nominating Committee. No two representatives selected by a Constituency shall be citizens of the same country or of countries located in the same Geographic Region. There may also be two liaisons to the GNSO Council, one appointed by each of the Governmental Advisory Committee and the At-Large Advisory Committee from time to time, who shall not be members of or entitled to vote on the GNSO Council, but otherwise shall be entitled to participate on equal footing with members of the GNSO Council. The appointing Advisory Committee shall designate its liaison (or revoke or change the designation of its liaison) on the GNSO Council by providing written notice to the Chair of the GNSO Council and to the ICANN Secretary. The GNSO Council may also have observers as described in paragraph 9 of this Section.
The proposed change is to replace "two" with "three" and leave the article otherwise unchanged.