Carlos and all, Please check out version 3, attached! Any more modifications needed, anybody? Best regards Olof -----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Affonso Pereira de Souza Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 3:51 PM To: Council GNSO Subject: Resp.: [council] Draft compilation of questions and comments from New gTLD sessions Hi Olof: Thanks for the hard work to compile all that and sorry for insisting in the morality and public order issue. In any case, is it possible to change the wording of the comment "What happened with blasphemy and the others of the original seven?" for something like "The other grounds for objection previously mentioned (such as obscenity and sedition) have been discarded?" I am suggesting that not only because I am not sure that there was exactly "original seven" grounds for objection, but also because the current wording can lead to the impression that my comment during the weekend session almost regrets that the others were not mentioned. And certainly that is not the case. Best, Carlos 2008/11/6, Olof Nordling <olof.nordling@icann.org>:
Robin and all, Oh well, checking the doc I realize that not only did I slot your comments re legal rights under MOPO, I also had slotted your MOPO comments under Community. Must have been late when I sorted them in that way -apologies. I have rearranged in the attached (and changed D to G...). Best regards Olof
From: Olof Nordling Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 1:25 PM To: 'Robin Gross' Cc: Council GNSO Subject: RE: [council] Draft compilation of questions and comments from New gTLD sessions
Hi Robin, Thanks - and I obviously need a hearing aid... Would appreciate your corrections, indeed! Best Olof
From: Robin Gross [mailto:robin@ipjustice.org] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 12:54 PM To: Olof Nordling Cc: Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] Draft compilation of questions and comments from New gTLD sessions
Hi Olof,
Thanks for pulling it together.
But it characterizes some of my comments incorrectly.
The points that I made under the heading of "legal rights of others" are incorrectly labeled in this document as "morality and public order" objections.
And several of my comments on the morality and public order implementation guidelines are not listed here at all.
Also, it was Principle G I referred to on the applicants freedom of expression rights, not Principle D as this document states.
Shall I send you my specific comments in written form to be added into this report so it accurately reflects the concerns I stated?
Thank you, Robin
On Nov 5, 2008, at 4:01 AM, Olof Nordling wrote:
Dear Councilors, As stated earlier today, I've consolidated questions and comments raised during the Saturday/Sunday New gTLD sessions in a draft, attached. I have rearranged them in line with the Draft Applicant Guidebook modules (although some comments relate to more than one module). I hope this can be useful for Council's further work in preparing joint or individual input to the comment areas for the respective modules. Very best regards Olof <gnso council comments.doc>
IP JUSTICE Robin Gross, Executive Director 1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA p: +1-415-553-6261 f: +1-415-462-6451 w: http://www.ipjustice.org e: robin@ipjustice.org<mailto:robin@ipjustice.org>