Hi, That would be a good idea, but i would suggest also sending it out on the list. thanks a. On 3 Feb 2008, at 09:49, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
I will go ahead and draft a motion Avri. Should I put into into the new Council workspace?
Chuck
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org ] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2008 3:51 AM To: Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] Draft Initial Report for IDNC
Hi,
I would think it would be better to have a motion in place a week before we vote, especially for a public meeting on a substantial issue. This can always be amended.
a.
On 2 Feb 2008, at 16:17, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
I am willing to take a crack at a motion but wonder if I should wait until after our working session on Sunday in New Delhi?
Chuck
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org ] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 10:39 AM To: Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] Draft Initial Report for IDNC
Hi,
This should probably be framed into a motion by someone for Wednesday's meeting.
a.
On 2 Feb 2008, at 09:37, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
Note that ICANN pusblished the Draft Initial Report for the IDNC for public comment: http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/draft-initial-report-idnc- wg-01fe b08.pdf
A decision we need to consider is whether we want to provide GNSO comments on this. In particular, we could provide relevant comments from our response to the ccNSO/GAC Issues Paper on IDN ccTLDs. Because the comment period ends 26 February, we probably should decide
this in New Delhi when we are talking about this topic.
On a related note, the public comment period on the Introduction of IDN ccTLDs ends on 25 February. We had previously discussed whether we should submit our full response to the ccNSO/GAC Issues Paper on IDN ccTLDs. I personally support this because our response directly answers the questions in that issues paper. But we should decide that
in New Delhi. Certainly, we need to provide our response to the Board
because they requested it.
Chuck Gomes
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify sender immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."