Dear all: I wanted to clarify that the mechanisms we are discussing in connection with the motion and PDP WG, namely the UDRP, the URS, and any newly developed mechanism for IGOs, are all administrative alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, rather than arbitration mechanisms. There is an important legal distinction between the two that we should recognize and adopt in our discussions. The UDRP and URS are contractual administrative mechanisms for resolving disputes outside of national courts. Conversely, arbitration awards are inter alia enforceable in national courts. See Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, New York (June 10, 1958). I do not believe this subtle point necessitates any changes to the draft Charter. I just wanted to add some clarity to guide our Council discussions, and perhaps PDP WG deliberations. Thank you, Brian Brian J. Winterfeldt Head of Internet Practice Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP 2900 K Street NW, North Tower - Suite 200 / Washington, DC 20007-5118 p / (202) 625-3562 f / (202) 339-8244 575 Madison Avenue / New York, NY 10022-2585 p / (212) 940.6762 f / (212) 894.5585 brian.winterfeldt@kattenlaw.com<mailto:brian.winterfeldt@kattenlaw.com> / www.kattenlaw.com<http://www.kattenlaw.com/> -----Original Message----- From: Winterfeldt, Brian J. Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 6:47 PM To: Marano, Phillip V. Subject: FW: [council] Fwd: FW: Draft CRP WG Charter - 25 May 2014 ________________________________________ From: owner-council@gnso.icann.orgOn<mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.orgOn> Behalf OfAvri Doria Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 1:44:44 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) To: council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: [council] Fwd: FW: Draft CRP WG Charter - 25 May 2014 A revised revision of the charter that corrects one mistake. avri -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FW: Draft CRP WG Charter - 25 May 2014 Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 08:58:43 -0700 From: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org>> To: Avri Doria <avri@acm.org<mailto:avri@acm.org>>, Maria Farrell <maria.farrell@gmail.com<mailto:maria.farrell@gmail.com>> Hello ladies - are you planning to send this to the Council for discussion this evening? Thanks! From: Lori Schulman <lori.schulman@ascd.org <mailto:lori.schulman@ascd.org<mailto:lori.schulman@ascd.org%20%3cmailto:lori.schulman@ascd.org>>> Date: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 at 2:31 PM To: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org <mailto:mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org%20%3cmailto:mary.wong@icann.org>>> Subject: FW: Draft CRP WG Charter - 25 May 2014 FYI - just sent *Lori S. Schulman** General Counsel 1703 North Beauregard Street Alexandria, VA 22311-1714 P 703-575-5678 * Lori.Schulman@ascd.org<mailto:Lori.Schulman@ascd.org> <mailto:Lori.Schulman@ascd.org> Description: cid:image001.png@01CC81E2.512C46F0 *From:*Lori Schulman *Sent:* Tuesday, June 24, 2014 9:21 AM *To:* 'Kathy Kleiman'; 'Avri Doria (avri@acm.org<mailto:avri@acm.org> <mailto:avri@acm.org>)' *Cc:* 'Rudi Vansnick (rudi.vansnick@isoc.be<mailto:rudi.vansnick@isoc.be> <mailto:rudi.vansnick@isoc.be>)'; 'Rafik Dammak (rafik.dammak@gmail.com<mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com> <mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com>)' *Subject:* RE: Draft CRP WG Charter - 25 May 2014 *Importance:* High Dear All, Attached is the amendment with the name of the UN list corrected. I didn't catch that last night. I went to the UN link that Avri provided and literally copied the title. There is a redline with the corrected version and then a "clean" redline. This should go to the GNSO Council. This was clearly a drafting error. Lori *Lori S. Schulman** General Counsel 1703 North Beauregard Street Alexandria, VA 22311-1714 P 703-575-5678 * Lori.Schulman@ascd.org<mailto:Lori.Schulman@ascd.org> <mailto:Lori.Schulman@ascd.org> Description: cid:image001.png@01CC81E2.512C46F0 *From:*Lori Schulman *Sent:* Monday, June 23, 2014 4:41 PM *To:* 'Kathy Kleiman'; Avri Doria (avri@acm.org<mailto:avri@acm.org> <mailto:avri@acm.org>) *Cc:* Rudi Vansnick (rudi.vansnick@isoc.be<mailto:rudi.vansnick@isoc.be> <mailto:rudi.vansnick@isoc.be>); Rafik Dammak (rafik.dammak@gmail.com<mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com> <mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com>) *Subject:* RE: Draft CRP WG Charter - 25 May 2014 (3) with LS Edit I like these changes. Thanks for expanding. I especially like the "research who already owns marks." Good Luck at the GNSO. *Lori S. Schulman** General Counsel 1703 North Beauregard Street Alexandria, VA 22311-1714 P 703-575-5678 * Lori.Schulman@ascd.org<mailto:Lori.Schulman@ascd.org> <mailto:Lori.Schulman@ascd.org> Description: cid:image001.png@01CC81E2.512C46F0 *From:*Kathy Kleiman [mailto:kathy@kathykleiman.com] <mailto:[mailto:kathy@kathykleiman.com]> *Sent:* Monday, June 23, 2014 3:45 PM *To:* Lori Schulman; Avri Doria (avri@acm.org<mailto:avri@acm.org> <mailto:avri@acm.org>) *Cc:* Rudi Vansnick (rudi.vansnick@isoc.be<mailto:rudi.vansnick@isoc.be> <mailto:rudi.vansnick@isoc.be>); Rafik Dammak (rafik.dammak@gmail.com<mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com> <mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com>) *Subject:* Re: Draft CRP WG Charter - 25 May 2014 (3) with LS Edit Hi All, Tx so much to Lori for starting everything. I really appreciate it! All, here is an edited version based on considerations of scope and limits that we discussed in framing both the UDRP and URS. What do you think? Best, Kathy p.s. Lori, again, tx you! What do you think of the edits? Hopefully, I extended and continued your thoughts... : Dear Avri and Kathy, Here is my attempt at a short, hopefully not too debatable, amendment to the charter. My edits and comments are in redline form. I tried to keep it very simple given the issue of time. I put 2 new bullet points before the final bullet point under "The WG should also include the following additional topics in its deliberations:" I specifically referenced the Nice Classification system as a method of mission differentiation as an optional clause. My thoughts are to leave it out but I wanted to surface the option to the group instead of just dismissing it out of hand. Nice has a lot of problems but it is the document that drives international classification and may be worth referencing. I will leave that up to you. / / I believe that this working group should move forward and incorporate the principles that we discussed yesterday. Perhaps these few lines will do the trick? Please let me know if I can help further. *Explore ways to make excellent teaching the reality in every classroom. Attend the ASCD Conference on Teaching Excellence, June 27-29, in Dallas, Tex. Choose from more than 150 sessions on assessment, college and career readiness, STEM, and instructional practices. Featured presenters include Jay McTighe, Baruti Kafele, Richard Curwin and Carol Ann Tomlinson. Register NOW at **www.ascd.org/cte. <http://www.ascd.org/cte>* This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the person(s) to whom it has been sent, and may contain information that is confidential or legally protected. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this message in error, you are not authorized to copy, distribute, or otherwise use this message or its attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and permanently delete this message and any attachments. ASCD makes no guarantee that this e-mail is error or virus free. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ <http://www.avast.com/> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus <http://www.avast.com/> protection is active. *Explore ways to make excellent teaching the reality in every classroom. Attend the ASCD Conference on Teaching Excellence, June 27-29, in Dallas, Tex. Choose from more than 150 sessions on assessment, college and career readiness, STEM, and instructional practices. Featured presenters include Jay McTighe, Baruti Kafele, Richard Curwin and Carol Ann Tomlinson. Register NOW at **www.ascd.org/cte. <http://www.ascd.org/cte>***** This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the person(s) to whom it has been sent, and may contain information that is confidential or legally protected. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this message in error, you are not authorized to copy, distribute, or otherwise use this message or its attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and permanently delete this message and any attachments. ASCD makes no guarantee that this e-mail is error or virus free. =========================================================== CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this information may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. Please notify the sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended recipients and delete the original message without making any copies. =========================================================== NOTIFICATION: Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP is an Illinois limited liability partnership that has elected to be governed by the Illinois Uniform Partnership Act (1997). ===========================================================