Chuck, I consider it a friendly ammendment. I second the motion. Olga Enviado desde mi BlackBerry de movistar Profesional (http://www.movistarempresas.com.ar) -----Original Message----- From: <KnobenW@telekom.de> Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 21:57:24 To: <cgomes@verisign.com>; <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: AW: [council] Amended Motion To Approve OSC Tool Kit of Services Recommendations Well done, Chuck. I will second the motion. Wolf-Ulrich ________________________________ Von: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Gomes, Chuck Gesendet: Freitag, 4. Dezember 2009 21:56 An: GNSO Council Betreff: [council] Amended Motion To Approve OSC Tool Kit of Services Recommendations In response to Tim's proposed amendments to the Motion To Approve OSC Tool Kit of Services Recommendations, I considered his amendments friendly and hence revised the motion as attached and copied below. Note that the changes are highlighted in the attached document to make it easy to see the amendments. Olga and Wolf, as seconders to the motion, do you also consider the amendments friendly? Glen - please post the amended motion. Chuck Motion To Approve Tool Kit of Services Recommendations for GNSO Constituencies and Stakeholder Groups (amended 4 Dec 09) Motion by: Chuck Gomes Seconded by: Whereas the Board Governance Committee Report on GNSO Improvements (BGC Report) tasked ICANN staff with developing, within six months, in consultation with the GNSO Council, a "tool kit" of basic services that would be made available to all constituencies. (See Report of the Board Governance Committee GNSO Review Working Group on GNSO Improvements, 3 February 2008 located at http://www.icann.org/en/topics/gnso-improvements/gnso-improvements-repor t-03feb08.pdf, p. 46.); Whereas the ICANN Board approved the BGC GNSO Improvement Recommendations on 26 June 2008 (http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-26jun08.htm#_Toc76113182); Whereas in January 2009 the GNSO Council formed the Operations Steering Committee (OSC) to develop recommendations to implement operational changes contained in the BGC Report; Whereas the OSC established three Work Teams, including the GNSO Stakeholder Group and Constituency Operations Work Team, to take on the work of each of the three operational areas addressed in the BGC Report recommendations; Whereas the GNSO Stakeholder Group and Constituency Operations Work Team developed and approved Tool Kit Services Recommendations for GNSO Constituencies and Stakeholder Groups on 25 October 2009 and sent them to the OSC for review; Whereas the OSC accepted the Work Team's recommendations; Whereas on 5 Nov 09 the document was distributed to the Council list and Councilors were asked to forward the recommendations to their respective groups for review and comment ASAP with the tentative goal of Council action in our December meeting; Whereas the implementation of the toolkit has process and budgetary implications; RESOLVED, the Council approves the recommendations (http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/tool-kit-services-recommendations-for-gnso -05nov09-en.pdf <http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/tool-kit-services-recommendations-for-gnso -05nov09-en.pdf> ) and directs Staff to: 1) share the recommendations with the Board; 2) post the document on the GNSO web page at http://gnso.icann.org/ <http://gnso.icann.org/> ; 3) estimate the cost of the services; 4) estimate what funds might be available; 5) prioritize the list of services in cooperation with the Council; 6) develop specifications for providing the services, including requirements for their use and procedures for requesting them; and 7) notify applicable GNSO organizations of the services, specifications and procedures for requesting them.