Hi, This is the same membership basis that was used for the CWG-Stewardship, a charter the council already approved. In fact ths cahrter was patterned off of that with the missions and goals being different, but the modalities being similar. I do not recall any discussion during the drafting about a larger representation. Only the CSG-Internet had the larger membership count, it was the exception given if long operation as an ad-hoc group without a charter. Incidentally, the team from the GNSO on this drafting team consisted of: *GNSO*: Avri Doria Keith Drazek David Fares *Thomas Rickert (co-chair)* I hope that helps clarify. avri On 06-Nov-14 17:41, Gabriela Szlak wrote:
Dear all,
Thanks so much for the hard work on this.
Regarding the charter, I would like to ask a clarifying question on the issue of membership of the CCWG.
The charter says:
*"Each of the chartering organizations shall appoint a minimum of 2 and a maximum of 5 members to the working group in accordance with their own rules and procedures"*
¿Could we clarify before the next council call what this means?
I recall a long discussion in LA on membership regarding the Charter for the CCWG on IG so I would like to be sure we all understand the language, as I am not sure I do, and Susan and I need to report to BC members and ask for guidance on this topic. There is a huge amount of work to be done on this CCWG and we believe that diversity of expertise and viewpoints in membership is crucial to achieve to proposed goals.
Thanks a lot, Gabi
*Gabriela Szlak *
*Skype:* gabrielaszlak
*Twitter: @*GabiSzlak
La información contenida en este e-mail es confidencial. The information in this e-mail is confidential.
2014-11-03 19:16 GMT-03:00 Avri Doria <avri@acm.org>:
Hi,
I second the motion.
As a member of the DT, I also applaud the effort and cooperative spirit of the DT group. We are getting better at starting up these CWG efforts, and I admit that the time we did it in looks like it may be far shorter than my predictions.
avri
On 04-Nov-14 05:52, Thomas Rickert wrote:
All, please find attached for your consideration a motion considering the adoption of the charter for the Enhancing Accountability CWG as well as the charter.
Let me take the opportunity to applaud DT members, ICANN staff and my co-chair Mathieu Weill on having produced the attached charter in a very short time span in a most collaborative fashion.
Thanks, Thomas