I must confess it's partly "my bad" - in helping to work on the final agenda yesterday I'd switched up the RAP issue and had meant to do the same with the RAA motion, but for some reason didn't do both (ironic, I know, given that I had proposed the RAA motion!) Mary W S Wong Professor of Law Chair, Graduate IP Programs Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH 03301USAEmail: mary.wong@law.unh.eduPhone: 1-603-513-5143Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584>>> From: William Drake <william.drake@graduateinstitute.ch> To:"Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@cov.com> CC:'Stéphane Van Gelder'<stephane.vangelder@indom.com>, Zahid Jamil <zahid@dndrc.com>, "'GNSO Council'" <council@gnso.icann.org> Date: 3/16/2011 2:46 PM Subject: Re: [council] Tomorrow's Public Council Meeting Agenda Prioritisation Given the time crunch and the possibility that things could get pressed at the back end, front loading the motions seems sensible to me too. Just switch items 4 and 8 and we're there… Bill On Mar 16, 2011, at 11:34 AM, Rosette, Kristina wrote:
I support Zahid's request and request that you reconsider, Stephane.
Leaving at the end of the agenda the two motions that the CPH is certain to oppose lends itself to optics issues that I'd prefer we avoid.
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 9:29 PM To: Zahid Jamil Cc: 'GNSO Council' Subject: Re: [council] Tomorrow's Public Council Meeting Agenda Prioritisation
Thanks Zahid.
Setting up the agenda and the logistics around this meeting has taken up a lot of our time and energy due to the scheduling complications involved.
At this stage, I would therefore not give anybody more work (including myself), by making any last-minute changes unless they are absolutely necessary.
Thanks for your understanding.
Stéphane
Le 16 mars 2011 à 02:20, Zahid Jamil a écrit :
Would it be possible to have those Agenda items that involve Motions
to be passed to be taken up as a priority ie. for them to be dealt with earlier in the meeting.
Best regards,
Zahid Jamil
Barrister-at-law
Jamil & Jamil
Barristers-at-law
219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
Cell: +923008238230
Tel: +92 21 35680760 / 35685276 / 35655025
Fax: +92 21 35655026
www.jamilandjamil.com <http://www.jamilandjamil.com/>
Notice / Disclaimer
This message contains confidential information and its contents are
being communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not
the intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received
this message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents
above may contain/are the intellectual property of Jamil & Jamil, Barristers-at-Law, and constitute privileged information protected by attorney client privilege. The reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever of any part or parts
(including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use of this communication) without prior written permission and consent of Jamil & Jamil is prohibited.
<winmail.dat>