Hello Mawaki,
Have we, documented, any cases where PDP was not initiated after an issues report has been requested by the council and, well..., issued?
We are great at documentation - but not good are organising that documentation :-) Ie we certainly have all the minutes of the meetings, and draft documents. Go here for a reasonable list of "issues": http://www.gnso.icann.org/issues/ We did commission an issues report on IDNs: http://www.gnso.icann.org/issues/idn-tlds/issues-report-17jul06.htm I don't think the issues report was ever finalised. We did decide to form a working group to examine the issues further. My understanding is that the IDN issues are currently being treated as types of new gTLDs, and the work of the working group is being incorporated into the final report with respect to implementation guidelines. So I think this is an example of where we called for an issues report but didn't proceed to a full PDP. There have also been various reviews of existing policy (transfers and UDRP) - but we haven't yet decided to proceed to a PDP to update those policies. E.g see: http://www.gnso.icann.org/issues/udrp/table-udrp-issue.shtml Regards, Bruce Tonkin