Hi, We (Chuck, Glen and I) am in the process of putting together the agenda for the meeting on the 27th. I have some questions: - Is someone going to offer a motion regarding electronic voting. - re the Whois studies discussion - is there need to invite Lorrie Cranor, the expert who was consulted in preparing the report, to the meeting. I have been informed that she is available, but we don't want to waster her time, or ICANN budget, if we don't have any specific questions for her at this time. - On March 6 Denise reported that the Board was waiting for the GNSO and/or CCNSO to submit a followup to our counter-point letters. Is this something we want to pursue or are we happy with the way things are going? Note: As I mentioned briefly at the end of the previous meeting, the ccNSO has contacted me regarding the Paris meeting with a proposal that we meet together on Thursday afternoon. I think this is a good idea. What do others think? One pending issue is whether this is a council-council meeting, as it was last time, or an SO-SO meeting? As I understand it, the ccNSO generally meets in full SO mode. If it is to be a SO-SO meeting, I would like to find a volunteer to work with the ccNSO volunteer to set this up. I will add this to the agenda, but wanted to bring up the issue. thanks. a.