One topic that may be worth raising during the discussion is whether the work of the panels will be expanded to take into account the recent developments. I am particularly interested, how ICANN can develop and implement a truly bottom-up, multistakeholder accountability structure. Is accountability even an issue for the strategy panels? It should be... Volker Am 19.03.2014 12:41, schrieb john@crediblecontext.com:
Mikey, Recall that we originally sought to have Beth Novack, the chair of the Multi-Stakeholder Innovation Strategy Panel attend so that there might be a Q-and-A. This was driven by the initial set of proposals from the Panel and the emergence of "crowdsourcing" as a legitimate way to make policy. Staff will be standing in. Berard
--------- Original Message --------- Subject: Re: [council] can somebody remind me what the "Teresa Swinehart Update" item is on Sunday? From: "David Cake" <dave@difference.com.au> Date: 3/18/14 9:23 pm To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@haven2.com> Cc: "Council" <council@gnso.icann.org>
Theresa will be updating us on the MSI panels work before we have our open discussion about them. David
On 19 Mar 2014, at 4:33 am, Mike O'Connor <mike@haven2.com <mailto:mike@haven2.com>> wrote:
this is mostly aimed at David Cake or Jonathan. but any/all are welcome to help out. i’m looking at that Teresa Swinehart Update item on Sunday morning just before the Strat Panel section. i can’t remember what she’s updating us *about* can somebody remind me? sorry to be so dense, mikey
PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com <http://www.haven2.com/>, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)