Thanks Mary. Stéphane Le 9 mars 2010 à 10:47, Mary Wong a écrit :
Yes, I do - thanks.
Mary
Mary W S Wong Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs Franklin Pierce Law Center Two White Street Concord, NH 03301 USA Email: mwong@piercelaw.edu Phone: 1-603-513-5143 Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
From: Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@indom.com> To: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com> CC: "Mary Wong" <MWong@piercelaw.edu>, <council@gnso.icann.org> Date: 3/9/2010 3:46 AM Subject: Re: [council] Friendly amendments to VI motion
Thanks Tim. I accept this as friendly. Mary, do you accept it? If so, Glen, please update the motion to reflect this.
Stéphane
Le 9 mars 2010 à 09:37, Tim Ruiz a écrit :
Hopefully the final form of this friendly amendment request.
Replace the section titled "Changes to this Charter" with:
The Chair will submit requests for substantive changes to this Charter to the GNSO Council for approval. The Chair may, at any time, refer questions or requests for clarification on any of the objectives or definitions contained in this charter to the GNSO Council. Such requests may be relayed through the Council Liaison.
Tim
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [council] Friendly amendments to VI motion From: Stéphane_Van_Gelder <stephane.vangelder@indom.com> Date: Tue, March 09, 2010 1:29 am To: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com> Cc: "Mary Wong" <MWong@piercelaw.edu>, council@gnso.icann.org
Tim,
So what is the final version of the amendment you are putting forward?
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 8 mars 2010 à 22:08, Tim Ruiz a écrit :
That was unintentional. The reference to the WG chair is fine with me.
Tim
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: [council] Friendly amendments to VI motion From: "Mary Wong" <MWong@piercelaw.edu> Date: Mon, March 08, 2010 6:34 am To: <council@gnso.icann.org>
Hi everyone
For some reason I didn't get Tim's email proposing further amendments to the amended VI motion, so forgive me if I'm getting something wrong. I just wanted to ask Tim if he could explain the request. As I read it as forwarded to me, there seems a possibility that dropping the reference to the WG Chair from the first sentence raises the possibility that a WG member who is NOT the Chair could go directly to seek Council approval, bypassing the Chair whose role it is to achieve consensus amongst the WG.
Cheers Mary
Mary W S Wong Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs Franklin Pierce Law Center Two White Street Concord, NH 03301 USA Email: mwong@piercelaw.edu Phone: 1-603-513-5143 Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584