Begin forwarded message:
From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us> Date: 10 August 2009 11:00:10 EDT To: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us>, "Robin Gross" <robin@ipjustice.org
, "David W. Maher" <dmaher@pir.org>, <mike@rodenbaugh.com>, "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>, <zahid@jamilandjamil.com>, "Metalitz, Steven" <met@msk.com>, "Mason Cole" <masonc@snapnames.com>, "Avri Doria" <avri@acm.org>, <tonyarholmes@btinternet.com , "Olga Cavalli" <olgac@fibertel.com.ar>, <tdavis2@speakeasy.net> Cc: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@icann.org>, "Margie Milam" <Margie.Milam@icann.org , "Liz Gasster" <liz.gasster@icann.org>, "Marika Konings" <marika.konings@icann.org , "Gisella Gruber-White" <Gisella.Gruber-White@icann.org> Subject: RE: Policy Developer Process Work Team - Attendance
All,
I have not gotten a response from anyone on this list and am looking for ideas on how we can improve attendance and participation from each of the constituencies.
We had yet another meeting last Thursday and aside from myself and ICANN staff, only 5 others showed up (2 registrars (Bladel & Diaz), 1 registry (Maher), an ALAC rep (Greenberg), and Avri in her personal capacity). There was no rep from the CBUC, ISP, IP or NCUC constituencies. Please find enclosed an updated chart. Some more figures to consider:
Out of the 12 meetings since March 19th:
· The NCUC rep has attended only 1 meeting (and that was in early April) · One of the 2 CBUC members have attended only 7 or the 12 meetings (none since June) · Of the 3 IP reps, one of them has only showed up in a total of only 4 meetings (None since May) · An ISP rep has shown up for 7 of 12 meetings · Registrars – Congrats – You have attended all of the meetings and are the model for everyone to follow! · Registries – You have participated in 9 of the 12 meetings.
Avri, can you please post these results on the GNSO Council website and make a plea during the next meeting for more participation. This may include substituting members of constituencies who can no longer attend or at the very least appointing alternatives.
Thanks for your help.
Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.
From: Neuman, Jeff Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 11:34 AM To: 'Robin Gross'; 'David W. Maher'; 'mike@rodenbaugh.com'; Philip Sheppard; zahid@jamilandjamil.com; 'Metalitz, Steven'; 'Mason Cole'; Avri Doria; 'tonyarholmes@btinternet.com'; 'Olga Cavalli'; 'tdavis2@speakeasy.net ' Subject: Policy Developer Process Work Team - Attendance
All,
As Chair of the Policy Development Process Work Team, I wanted to write to you all, as Chairs for your respective constituencies and/ or nominating committee reps to the GNSO Council, to solicit your help in getting attendance at our bi-weekly conference calls and participation on the mailing lists. Although I understand it is summer and attendance usually goes down, I am attaching a chart that shows the attendance of the members of the Work Team for the past several months. A couple of the constituencies have good records, but most of them are not. Perhaps you can go back to your respective constituencies to see what you can do to get those that are signed up to attend, or to find suitable replacements.
Thanks for your attention to this matter. Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help you all out.
Best regards,
Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy 46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166 Office: +1.571.434.5772 Mobile: +1.202.549.5079 Fax: +1.703.738.7965 / jeff.neuman@neustar.biz / www.neustar.biz The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.