Hi, This is an example of what I mean about disclaimer in the body of a report being somewhat irrelevant. Though the report did come out decently, there is still the problem of an un-chartered adhoc group speaking in the name of the GNSO and the rest of ICANN with a statement that received little or no community review. Lately we have been lucky with things that are set up incorrectly producing a decent product (The ICANN Review teams and this). I believe, however, that each time this happens, it weakens the community's hold on its processes. avri -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [ccwg-internet-governance] CCWG contribution in ICANN's homepage banner Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 10:00:04 -0700 From: Alexandra Dans <> To: ccwg-internet-governance@icann.org <ccwg-internet-governance@icann.org> Dear all, The CCWG contribution is being shared from the first banner of ICANN’s homepage. See image below
