Bill, Please see the attached email message that I sent to the Council list. Note that I mentioned this in the 28 October Council meeting and forwarded Liz's paper shortly thereafter. Because of the 15 November deadline for agendas and related documents for Cartagena meetings, we could not wait until the 18 November meeting. In a subsequent email message I communicated that both Chris and Heather are supportive of the topic and forwarded Liz's paper to their groups. Detailed agendas and questions are still to be developed. Your suggestions will be helpful in that regard. Chuck
-----Original Message----- From: William Drake [mailto:william.drake@graduateinstitute.ch] Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 8:23 AM To: Gomes, Chuck Cc: GNSO Council List Subject: Re: [council] GNSO-GAC meeting in Cartagena
Hi Chuck,
On Nov 17, 2010, at 1:48 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
Bill,
Your suggestions fit nicely into the topic that has already been selected by all three groups (GNSO, GAC & ccNSO)
Thanks, I must have missed this conversation; happily, I'm not alone in that. When did the Council discuss this?
based on the paper that
Liz produced regarding what needs to be done in the future regarding community WGs. It seems natural to me to talk about successes and failures of the Rec6 CWG and the JAS WG as we explore how we facilitate CWGs going forward.
Ok, but I wasn't suggesting a discussion about the procedural aspects of CWGs (although some time on that would be good too), but rather about the substantive issues and proposals involved in these two cases.
Where's the topic specified, do we have a list of discussion questions per previous?
Thanks much,
Bill
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner- council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of William Drake Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 7:37 AM To: GNSO Council List Subject: [council] GNSO-GAC meeting in Cartagena
Hi
On tomorrow's call we are to discuss "6.2 Topic(s) for Joint
meetings
with the GAC & ccNSO"
We've just had two intensive and successful group collaborations on questions of particular interest to the GAC, namely Rec. 6/former MAPO and JAS/applicant support. Wouldn't it be helpful to hear GAC perspectives and engage in some dialogue with them on a) the outputs of these groups, and how well they speak to concerns GAC has raised in the past, and b) how those outputs should be dealt with going forward? Given all the efforts expended and the pressing need to settle this stuff to the community's satisfaction, one would think this is the best way we could use the time. Unless of course we'd prefer to talk about categories :-)
Thoughts?
Best,
Bill
*********************************************************** William J. Drake Senior Associate Centre for International Governance Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies Geneva, Switzerland william.drake@graduateinstitute.ch www.williamdrake.org ***********************************************************
*********************************************************** William J. Drake Senior Associate Centre for International Governance Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies Geneva, Switzerland william.drake@graduateinstitute.ch www.williamdrake.org ***********************************************************