[council] Issue for IDN discussion

Hi, In addition to the general issue I brought up in an earlier message about the basic presumptions over general name space and its (re-) allocation, i would like to offer a starting question for discussion: To what extent is there support within the council for the allocation of at most 1 IDN in 1 Script per 3166-1 based ccTLD by methods chosen by the IDNC fast track WG, so long as it is clearly understood that no other allocations may be made until such time as there is a community wide discussion and agreement of any further re-allocation of gNSO namespace to the ccNSO? a.