I wouldn't think you are picky at all, Thomas. It is important that we keep our processes neat, and your vigilance helps achieving that. I thought that was what we did for the RN's SoW? Mawaki --- Thomas Keller <tom@schlund.de> wrote:
Hello,
I do not want to be picky and keep the WG from working but it is my understanding that the SoW for the WG has to be ratified by the council and not by the WG itself.
Best,
tom
Am 16.02.2007 schrieb Liz Williams:
For ease of reference, I have attached Chuck's suggested edits.
I will be convening the first meeting of the group on Tuesday 20
Feb
at 7:30 LA, 10:30 am EST, 15:30 UTC, 16:30 CET.
At the first meeting we will:
1. appoint a chair of the group
2. review the existing Statement of Work and agree its final form
3. agree the first tranche of activities to be completed between now and the ICANN Lisbon meeting
The rules of the Working Group will be similar to those of the IDN-WG (found at http://gnso.icann.org/announcements/announcement-18nov06.htm)
Can I urge you please to consult with your constituencies and propose participants for the group? It is MOST likely that there will be an aggressive schedule of activities to support the work as this work is being conducted in the context of the new TLDs Committee activities and is time critical. This will mean small working groups or individual efforts and, at a minimum, a weekly conference call.
Please respond to the GNSO secretariat to indicate that you or your constituency representative wants to be included in a new public
mailing list.
Kind regards and, of course, any questions, please call or email.
Liz
.....................................................
Liz Williams Senior Policy Counselor ICANN - Brussels +32 2 234 7874 tel +32 2 234 7848 fax +32 497 07 4243 mob
Gruss,
tom
(__) (OO)_____ (oo) /|\ A cow is not entirely full of | |--/ | * milk some of it is hamburger! w w w w