In light of Alan's request and energy around the above noted protections, can we swap one for the other at the public meeting? Berard Sent from my iPhone On Jun 27, 2012, at 10:56 AM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
I will unfortunately have to leave the meeting early this afternoon. If a way can be found to defer this discussion until the next Council meeting, I would appreciate it. Given the schedule change, perhaps this will happen in any case.
Alan
At 26/06/2012 12:53 PM, Glen de Saint Géry wrote:
Item 11: Fake Renewal Notices (10 minutes) The GNSO Council requested that a small group prepare a request for information concerning Fake Renewal Notices for the RrSG to help inform its deliberations on the RAP WG Recommendation on Fake Renewal Notices (#2). The drafting team submitted its report to the GNSO Council on 6 March. Following a presentation of the report to the GNSO Council at the ICANN Meeting in Costa Rica, the GNSO Council decided to put the report out for public comment. A public comment forum was opened (see http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/fake-renewal-notices-report-21ma... ) and has now closed. At its last meeting, the GNSO Council requested the DT to review the comments received, update the report if deemed appropriate and report back accordingly. The DT has reviewed the comments received and submitted its updated report to the GNSO Council on 21 June (see http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg13234.html). Presentation of updated Fake Renewal Notices Report (Mikey O'Connor) Discussion and open microphone Next steps