Council, I would like to propose an amendment based on Julf input on .6. so it reads only “6. In accordance with the GAC’s internal rules and processes" Best, Martín
On 15 Jan 2020, at 08:44, Johan Helsingius <julf@julf.com> wrote:
Please find below and attached the motion for the GNSO Council’s 23 January vote to approve the RPM Charter addendum establishing an IGO Work Track.
Thanks, Keith!
6. To facilitate communications between the GNSO and the GAC on this topic, the GNSO Council directs the GNSO liaison to the GAC to provide regular progress reports to the GAC, in accordance with the GAC’s internal rules and processes.
I am slightly concerned by the wording of this. "In accordance with the GAC’s internal rules and processes" is rather open-ended. Is it our job to be aware of and confirm to GAC internal procedures?
I assume the actual progress reports will come from the WT leads and staff, or am I, as liaison to the GAC, expected to participate in the WT and produce independent reports?
Julf
Julf _______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.