Thanks you Mary. Stéphane Le 7 mars 2010 à 08:57, Mary Wong a écrit :
Thanks, Stephane - yes, I too accept Caroline's proposed amendment as friendly.
Cheers Mary
Mary W S Wong Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs Franklin Pierce Law Center Two White Street Concord, NH 03301 USA Email: mwong@piercelaw.edu Phone: 1-603-513-5143 Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
From: Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@indom.com> To: Glen de Saint Géry<Glen@icann.org> CC: GNSO Council <council@gnso.icann.org> Date: 3/7/2010 2:53 AM Subject: Fwd: [council] Friendly amendment to VI Charter Glen,
If Mary is Ok with this proposed change, please update the motion on https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?10_march_2010_motions to reflect the amendment.
Thank you.
Stéphane
Début du message réexpédié :
De : Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@indom.com> Date : 7 mars 2010 08:49:06 HNEC À : Caroline Greer <cgreer@mtld.mobi> Cc : <council@gnso.icann.org> Objet : Rép : [council] Friendly amendment to VI Charter
Dear Caroline,
I accept your amendment as friendly.
Thank you.
Stéphane
Le 5 mars 2010 à 11:40, Caroline Greer a écrit :
Dear All, The Registries Stakeholder Group [RySG] would like to propose a friendly amendment to the Vertical Integration Charter circulated by Stéphane. For purposes of accuracy and consistency, we believe that Objective #4 should be revised to read: To identify and clearly articulate the differences between the current restrictions and practices concerning registry-registrar separation and equivalent access, on the one hand, and the options described in the most recent version of the DAG and supporting documents[1] and changes considered by staff, on the other hand. The words equivalent access in yellow would replace the words equal access that are in the current version of Objective #4. We understand that the Charter Group has recognized the difference between equal access and equivalent access in its deliberations and has adopted equivalent access in other parts of the Charter. More generally, the RySG notes that the proposed working definitions in the Charter are neither accurate nor complete and, in certain cases, they represent policy statements. The RySG underscores the importance of developing standalone definitions for each element of vertical integration. However, these definitions should be developed by experts in competition and antitrust matters and derived from, where possible, language in ICANN contracts and ICANN documentation that uses the relevant terms. Many thanks. Kind regards, Caroline.
[1] The working group understands that the DAG is a fluid document. As a result, the working group will conduct its activities based upon the version of the document available.