Thanks all! Sent from my iPhone On 18 Apr 2019, at 01:05, Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele@blacknight.com<mailto:michele@blacknight.com>> wrote: With Staff’s help the document has been updated with the edit that I suggested and that was accepted by the BC So, hopefully, it’s acceptable to all Regards Michele -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://www.blacknight.com https://blacknight.blog / http://ceo.hosting/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow, R93 X265 ,Ireland Company No.: 370845 From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org>> on behalf of Marie Pattullo <marie.pattullo@aim.be<mailto:marie.pattullo@aim.be>> Date: Wednesday 17 April 2019 at 17:45 To: "Johan "Julf" Helsingius" <julf@julf.com<mailto:julf@julf.com>> Cc: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Subject: Re: [council] GAC Communique response Thanks Julf; the BC is happy with the shorter redraft proposed by Michele: One of the expected outputs of Phase 2 of the EPDP is a recommendation to incorporate privacy by design into any system used. The Council trusts that it will be fully informed of, and involved where appropriate in, the scoping and execution of any parallel technical efforts related to such policies. Sent from my iPhone On 17 Apr 2019, at 18:27, Johan Helsingius <julf@julf.com<mailto:julf@julf.com>> wrote: Thanks, Marie, Michele (and others), how do you feel about this suggestion? Could we please have all suggestions/opinions in before 23:59 UTC, so the document can be frozen? Julf On 16-04-19 16:50, Marie Pattullo wrote: Thanks to all the drafters for your work on this! The BC proposes the following amendment to point 1(iv): iv) Any technical solutions need to be designed so that they take into consideration the policies they need to handle. While some may argue that systems are “flexible”enough to allow for a broad variety of policies, one such policy which is critical, and which should be a policy output from Phase 2 of the EPDP, is that the system must incorporate well-understood, current state-of-the-art “privacy by design” principles for online systems. The Council trusts that it will be fully informed of, and implicated where appropriate in, the scoping and execution of any parallel technical effort to define such a policy. that is not the same as “privacy by design” which is probably what is called for. Due to the nature of ICANN’s PDP processes, it may be premature to attempt to launch parallel work on this. Thanks again, Marie -----Original Message----- From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org>> On Behalf Of Johan Helsingius Sent: Friday, April 12, 2019 6:51 PM To: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Subject: [council] GAC Communique response The suggested GNSO Council response to the GAC Communique attached. Google docs version at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WODNWffxy_dn6WRXV-_mJAwPhlh5V57T3L94BwQE... Julf