-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 31/08/2005 8:55 AM Liz Williams noted that;
Could I ask you to review it - the Chair has asked for comments to be in by Friday 2 Sept Brussels COB. He will then forward an updated document to the Board for 8 Sept once any additional comments are taken into account.
I have several other less substantive comments, but this one is significant enough to be submitted independently. I have a substantial objection to section 3.2 and would like to see it rephrased in substantially more positive and constructive terms. Current: 3.2. The GNSO Review is designed to determine: o whether that organization has a continuing purpose in the ICANN structure, o and, if so, whether any change in structure or operations is desirable to improve its effectiveness. Proposed: 3.2 The GNSO Review is designed to analyse: o the current and continued role of the GNSO in the ICANN structure, o and recommend what changes in its structure or operations, or those of ICANN itself, may be desirable to improve its effectiveness. - -- Regards, -rwr "Every contrivance of man, every tool, every instrument, every utensil, every article designed for use, of each and every kind, evolved from very simple beginnings." - Robert Collier Got Blog? http://www.blogware.com My Blogware: http://www.byte.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP) iD8DBQFDFbLA6sL06XjirooRAjYWAJwLaKzJz6yVcHj2uI7Cfur+GKhcswCeN9cR /NYr/gOAVYoF/3w+HSyI4Mo= =5CMY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----