seems fine to me. avri On 09-May-14 12:23, James M. Bladel wrote:
Jonathan & Colleagues:
My comments/edits attached. Note that I polished up some of the language, and added an additional point about the MSWG’s recommendation regarding geographic rotation.
Let me know if you have questions or would like to discuss further.
Thanks—
J.
From: Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info <mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info>> Organization: Afilias Reply-To: "jrobinson@afilias.info <mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info>" <jrobinson@afilias.info <mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info>> Date: Friday, May 9, 2014 at 4:32 To: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org <mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Cc: James Bladel <jbladel@godaddy.com <mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com>> Subject: FW: First draft of comments on MSWG report
James,
At our meeting yesterday, I think I understood that you would pick up the pen / absorb any proposed changes to this. Please confirm.
In any event, Councillors _please note that I intend to send this to the chair of the MSWG by 23h59 UTC today i.e. 9 May 2014_.
Thanks,
Jonathan
*From:*Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info] *Sent:* 05 May 2014 12:01 *To:* council@gnso.icann.org <mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> *Subject:* FW: First draft of comments on MSWG report
All,
We missed the opportunity to provide feedback to the MSWG via the public comment.
However, there is a very short term opportunity to provide feedback direct to the group as they process the public comment.
Please see a draft attached and provide any input on this ASAP.
Thank-you.
Jonathan