Dear all, Just a friendly reminder that the deadline for the submission of comments on the proposed Reserve Fund replenishment strategy is next Wednesday, 25 April. If you have any concerns or requested edits regarding the submission of the attached document on behalf of the Council, could you please indicate so in the coming days, and I will work with the Council's Standing Committee on Budget and Operations to resolve them. Please note, the attachment has not changed from the email sent to you last week, however there is currently one unresolved comment in the document, being the desired replenishment timeframe. The current proposal is for "five or less years" (which was the language suggested by ICANN org), however a representative of the Business Constituency within the SCBO has asked that this be changed to "three to five years." We would like to defer to the Council to determine which language is most appropriate. Thank you very much. Best wishes, Ayden Férdeline ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On 11 April 2018 11:30 PM, Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com> wrote:
Dear all,
On behalf of the Standing Committee on ICANN Budget and Operations (SCBO), please find attached a statement that we have prepared in relation to ICANN's proposed Reserve Fund replenishment strategy.
We are seeking to submit this comment on behalf of the Council on 25 April, absent any objections from a member of the Council. Could you please evaluate the attached document and advise if you have any questions, concerns, or requested edits? Thank you.
Please note, there is currently one unresolved comment in the document, being the desired replenishment timeframe. The current proposal is for "five or less years" (which was the language suggested by ICANN org), however a representative of the Business Constituency within the SCBO has asked that this be changed to "three to five years." We would like to defer to the Council to determine which language is most appropriate. Thank you.
Best wishes,
Ayden Férdeline